Abbonarsi

Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography - 26/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.030 
Roxy Senior, MD, FRCP a, , Wolfgang Lepper, MD b, Agnes Pasquet, MD c, George Chung, MBBS a, Rainer Hoffman, MD b, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde, MD c, Manuel Cerqueira, MD d, Sanjiv Kaul, MD e
a  Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom 
b Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany 
c Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital St Luc, St Luc, Belgium 
d Cardiovascular Division, Georgetown Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 
e Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA 

*Reprint requests: Roxy Senior, MD, DM, FRCP, FESC, FACC, Consultant Cardiologist and Director of Echocardiography and Cardiac Research, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Northwick Park Hospital Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HAI 3UJ, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background

No previous studies have compared myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a medium likelihood of CAD. This study was developed to test the hypothesis that MCE is superior to SPECT for the detection of CAD.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with a medium probability of CAD and no previous myocardial infarction were recruited. Results of MCE and SPECT were compared to quantitative coronary arteriography, where CAD was defined as >50% stenosis. Each patient was examined for the anterior and posterior circulations.

Results

On a coronary circulation basis (n = 110), the sensitivity of MCE was significantly greater than that of SPECT for the detection of CAD (86% vs 43%, P < .0001). However, the specificities were similar (88% and 93%, P = .52). Both techniques were marginally more accurate in the anterior compared to the posterior circulation (88% vs 76%, P = .07 for MCE and 79% vs 63%, P = .19, for SPECT). On a patient basis (n = 55), MCE had a higher sensitivity than SPECT for the detection of CAD (83% vs 49%, P < .05). Although specificity tended to be higher for SPECT than MCE (92% vs 58%), it was not significant (P = .33). When CAD was defined as >40% coronary stenosis, the specificity of MCE increased to 83% without any change in sensitivity.

Conclusion

In this preliminary study, MCE was found to be superior to SPECT during dipyridamole stress for the diagnosis of CAD in patients with a medium pretest probability of CAD. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Supported by a grant from Amersham Health, Amersham, UK, and in part by grants (RO1-HL48890 and RO1-HL66034) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.


© 2004  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 147 - N° 6

P. 1100-1105 - Giugno 2004 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Tamoxifen improves endothelial function and reduces carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal women
  • Kimon S Stamatelopoulos, John P Lekakis, Nikiforita A Poulakaki, Christos M Papamichael, Kyriaki Venetsanou, Konstantinos Aznaouridis, Athanasios D Protogerou, Theodoros G Papaioannou, Sanjay Kumar, Stamatios F Stamatelopoulos
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Effects of oral amino acid supplementation on myocardial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Roldano Scognamiglio, Christian Negut, Roberto Piccolotto, Francesco Saverio Dioguardi, Antonio Tiengo, Angelo Avogaro

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.