Abbonarsi

A comparison between oral antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the pilot study of prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (SPPAF), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial - 26/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.041 
Johann Auer, MD, FESC a, , Thomas Weber, MD a, Robert Berent, MD a, Rudolf Puschmann, MD b, Peter Hartl, MD b, Choi-Keung Ng, MD b, Christian Schwarz, MD b, Ernst Lehner, MD c, Ulrike Strasser, MD c, Elisabeth Lassnig, MD a, Gudrun Lamm, MD a, Bernd Eber, MD, FESC a
a Department of Cardiology, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria 
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria 
c Institute of Anesthesiology II, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria 

* Reprint requests: Johann Auer, MD, Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, General hospital Wels, Grieskirchnerstrasse 42, A-4600 Wels, Austria.

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and β-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies.

Methods and results

We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 ± 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P < .01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P = .01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P = .16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P = .65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P < .05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P < .05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 ± 8.9 days vs 11.3 ± 7; P = .10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups.

Conclusions

Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 The study medication was provided by Bristol-Myers-Squibb (sotalol), Ebewe (amiodarone), and AstraZeneca (metoprolol).


© 2004  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 147 - N° 4

P. 636-643 - Aprile 2004 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Differences in care-seeking behavior for acute chest pain in the United States and Japan
  • Lawrence Liao, David J Whellan, Katsuhiko Tabuchi, Kevin A Schulman
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • External loop recorders: determinants of diagnostic yield in patients with syncope
  • Lorne J Gula, Andrew D Krahn, David Massel, Allan Skanes, Raymond Yee, George J Klein

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.