Abbonarsi

Relationship of dose of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to the benefits of candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)–Added trial - 17/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.028 
John J.V. McMurray, MB, MD a, , James B. Young, MD b, Mark E. Dunlap, MD c, Christopher B. Granger, MD d, James Hainer, MD e, Eric L. Michelson, MD e, Steven Earle, PhD e, Bertil Olofsson, PhD f, Jan Östergren, MD g, Salim Yusuf, MD, DPhil h, Karl Swedberg, MD, PhD i, Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD j

on behalf of the CHARM Investigators

a Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland 
b Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 
c Case Western Reserve University and VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 
d Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 
e AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE 
f AstraZeneca, R&D Mölndal, Sweden 
g Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden 
h HGM-McMaster Clinic, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 
i Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg, Sweden 
j Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 

Reprint requests: John J.V. McMurray, MB, MD, Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, G11 6NT Glasgow, UK.

Riassunto

Background

Whether an angiotensin receptor blocker is of benefit when added to a full dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in heart failure (HF) is uncertain.

Methods

The effect of candesartan, compared with placebo, in 2548 patients randomized in the CHARM-Added trial was analyzed according to (i) ACE inhibitor dose at baseline, (ii) ACE inhibitor dose during follow-up, and (iii) combination treatment with ACE inhibitor and β-blocker at baseline. The main outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization.

Results

The benefit of candesartan was not modified by the dose of ACE inhibitor. In all patients (n = 2548), the candesartan/placebo hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.96). In patients taking a guideline recommended dose of ACE inhibitor at baseline (n = 1291), this HR was 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.95; interaction P value .26). In patients taking a Food and Drug Administration–designated maximum dose of ACE inhibitor (n = 529), this HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.57-0.98; interaction P value .29). The benefit of candesartan was preserved in patients taking β-blockers in addition to a higher dose of ACE inhibitor and in patients maintaining a high dose of ACE inhibitor throughout follow-up.

Conclusions

These clinical findings support the pharmacologic evidence that ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have distinct mechanisms of action and show that their combined use improves outcomes in patients with HF more than an evidence-based dose of ACE inhibitor alone.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 The CHARM program was funded by AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, which was responsible for data collection and analysis. Academic leadership was provided by the executive committee who supervised the management of the study and was responsible for the interpretation of the data, preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. Authors who are employees of AstraZeneca are identified as such. All other authors have received research grants, consultancy fees, and/or speaker fees from AstraZeneca.
Guest editor of this manuscript is Harvey D. White, DSc.


© 2006  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 151 - N° 5

P. 985-991 - Maggio 2006 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Periodontal infections cause changes in traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors: Results from a randomized controlled clinical trial
  • Francesco D'Aiuto, Mohamed Parkar, Luigi Nibali, Jean Suvan, Jan Lessem, Maurizio S. Tonetti
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Multifaceted intervention to promote ?-blocker use in heart failure
  • Nancy M. Allen LaPointe, Elizabeth R. DeLong, Anita Chen, Bradley G. Hammill, Lawrence H. Muhlbaier, Robert M. Califf, Judith M. Kramer

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.