Abbonarsi

Who is missing from the measures? Trends in the proportion and treatment of patients potentially excluded from publicly reported quality measures - 05/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.046 
Susannah M. Bernheim, MD, MHS a, b, , Yongfei Wang, MS a, b, Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD a, Frederick A. Masoudi, MD, MSPH c, Saif S. Rathore, MPH a, Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS a, Elizabeth Drye, MD a, b, Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM a, b, d
a Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
b Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), New Haven, CT 
c Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 
d Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 

Reprint requests: Susannah Bernheim, MD, MHS, YNHH/Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510.

Riassunto

Background

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provides public reporting on the quality of hospital care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Core Measures allow discretion in excluding patients because of relative contraindications to aspirin, β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We describe trends in the proportion of patients with AMI with contraindications that could lead to discretionary exclusion from public reporting.

Methods

We completed cross-sectional analyses of 3 nationally representative data cohorts of AMI admissions among Medicare patients in 1994-1995 (n = 170,928), 1998-1999 (n = 27,432), and 2000-2001 (n = 27,300) from the national Medicare quality improvement projects. Patients were categorized as ineligible (eg, transfer patients), automatically excluded (specified absolute medical contraindications), discretionarily excluded (potentially excluded based on relative contraindications), or “ideal” for treatment for each measure.

Results

For 4 of 5 measures, the percentage of discretionarily excluded patients increased over the 3 periods (admission aspirin 15.8% to 16.9%, admission β-blocker 14.3% to 18.3%, discharge aspirin 10.3% to 12.3%, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 2.8% to 3.9%; P < .001). Of patients potentially included in measures (those who were not ineligible or automatically excluded), the discretionarily excluded represented 25.5% to 69.2% in 2000-2001. Treatment rates among patients with discretionary exclusions also increased for 4 of 5 measures (all except angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors).

Conclusions

A sizeable and growing proportion of patients with AMI have relative contraindications to treatments that may result in discretionary exclusion from publicly reported quality measures. These patients represent a large population for which there is insufficient evidence as to whether measure exclusion or inclusion and treatment represents best care.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2010  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 160 - N° 5

P. 943 - Novembre 2010 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Physician diagnosis of overweight status predicts attempted and successful weight loss in patients with cardiovascular disease and central obesity
  • Siddharth Singh, Virend K. Somers, Matthew M. Clark, Kristin Vickers, Donald D. Hensrud, Yoel Korenfeld, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Association of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery with quality of care of patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines
  • Michael S. Kim, Tracy Y. Wang, Fang-Shu Ou, Andrew J. Klein, Paul A. Hudson, John C. Messenger, Frederick A. Masoudi, John S. Rumsfeld, P. Michael Ho

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.