Abbonarsi

Clinically suspect arthralgia and rheumatoid arthritis: patients’ perceptions of illness - 24/11/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105751 
Sarah J.H. Khidir a, , Pascal H.P. de Jong b, Annemiek Willemze c, Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil a, b, 1, Elise van Mulligen a, b, 1
a Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands 
b Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands 
c Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands 

Corresponding author. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands.Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical CenterP.O. Box 9600RC Leiden2300Netherlands

Highlights

Illness perceptions (IP) of patients at risk of RA (i.e. CSA) are largely unknown.
Patients at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis have equally severe IP.
IP on physical consequences and treatment-expectations varied between populations.
CSA-patients considered physical workload and genetics important causes of symptoms.
Insight into IP could enhance communication and care in patients at risk of RA.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abstract

Objectives

Clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) is an at-risk stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in which patients experience symptoms and physical limitations. Perceptions of CSA-patients have remained largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to map perceptions of CSA-patients and compare these to RA-patients. Additionally, we studied changes in perceptions in CSA over time.

Methods

Three hundred and ninety-nine consecutively included CSA-patients from the Leiden and Rotterdam CSA-cohorts and 100 recently diagnosed RA-patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic were included. Patients’ illness perceptions (IP) were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), consisting of 8 questions (scale 0–10; higher score indicating more negative IP) covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains, and one open question about causes of disease. IP were measured at baseline in both populations and during 2years follow-up in the CSA-cohorts.

Results

Total BIPQ-scores were comparable at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis (40±11 and 40±10; range 0–80). Comparing dimensions separately revealed that CSA-patients were less worried about physical complaints compared to RA-patients. However, CSA-patients were more negative about expected treatment-effect on symptoms. IP over time in CSA improved in patients without development of clinical arthritis (from 38±11 to 34±14; P=0.005) but remained similar in CSA-patients who progressed to arthritis/RA (mean 40 at both timepoints). CSA-patients mainly perceived physical strain and heredity as causes of their complaints.

Conclusions

Although CSA-patients have not developed clinical arthritis, illness perceptions at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis are equally severe. Knowledge on worries and expectations may contribute to improving patient-contact and care in patients at risk of RA.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Illness perceptions, Clinically suspect arthralgia, At-risk individuals, Rheumatoid arthritis, Patient attitude to health


Mappa


© 2024  The Authors. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 91 - N° 6

Articolo 105751- Dicembre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Pitfalls and pearls in diagnosing inflammatory arthritis in older patients
  • Justin Levinson, Bjoern Buehring
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Systemic auto-inflammatory manifestations in patients with spondyloarthritis
  • Carla Gaggiano, Mojca Zajc Avramovič, Antonio Vitale, Nina Emeršič, Jurgen Sota, Nataša Toplak, Stefano Gentileschi, Valeria Caggiano, Maria Tarsia, Gašper Markelj, Tina Vesel Tajnšek, Claudia Fabiani, Anja Koren Jeverica, Bruno Frediani, Maria Antonietta Mazzei, Luca Cantarini, Tadej Avčin

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.