Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Negative Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-β42 over Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography - 21/11/24

Doi : 10.14283/jpad.2024.49 
J.-M. Pyun 1, M.J. Kang 2, S.J. Baek 3, K. Lee 1, Y.H. Park 4, SangYun Kim 4,

Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

1 Department of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59, Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, 04401, Seoul, Republic of Korea 
2 Department of Neurology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53, Jinhwangdo-ro 61-gil, Gangdong-gu, 05368, Seoul, Republic of Korea 
3 Department of Radiology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, 155-7, Daewangpangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, 13552, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 
4 Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, 13620, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 

f neuroksy@snu.ac.kr neuroksy@snu.ac.kr

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Background

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) pathology is becoming increasingly important in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) because of its potential link to amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, a critical side effect observed during AD immunotherapy. Identification of CAA without typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers (MRI-negative CAA) is challenging, and novel detection biomarkers are needed.

Methods

We included 69 participants with high neuritic plaques (NP) burden, with and without CAA pathology (NP with CAA vs. NP without CAA) based on autopsy data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Two participants with hemorrhagic CAA markers based on MRI were excluded and the final analysis involved 36 NP without CAA and 31 NP with CAA. A logistic regression model was used to compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β42 (Aβ42), phosphorylated tau181, and total tau levels, the amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake ratio (SUVR), and cognitive profiles between NP with and without CAA. Regression models for CSF and PET were adjusted for age at death, sex, and the last assessed clinical dementia rating sum of boxes score. Models for cognitive performances was adjusted for age at death, sex, and education level.

Results

NP with CAA had significantly lower CSF Aβ42 levels when compared with those without CAA (110.5 pg/mL vs. 134.5 pg/mL, p-value = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low CSF Aβ42 levels were significantly associated with NP with CAA (odds ratio [OR]: 0.957, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.928, 0.987, p-value = 0.005). However, amyloid PET SUVR did not differ between NP with CAA and those without CAA (1.39 vs. 1.48, p-value = 0.666). Logistic regression model analysis did not reveal an association between amyloid PET SUVR and NP with CAA (OR: 0.360, 95% CI: 0.007, 1.741, p-value = 0.606).

Conclusions

CSF Aβ42 is more sensitive to predict MRI-negative CAA in high NP burden than amyloid PET.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Alzheimer’s disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, neuropathology, cerebrospinal fluid, amyloid positron emission tomography


Mappa


 Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf


© 2024  THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SERDI Publisher.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 11 - N° 4

P. 1041-1046 - Agosto 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • “Back to Braak”: Role of Nucleus Reuniens and Subcortical Pathways in Alzheimer’s Disease Progression
  • S. Censi, C. Sestieri, M. Punzi, A. Delli Pizzi, A. Ferretti, F. Gambi, V. Tomassini, Stefano Delli Pizzi, Stefano L. Sensi, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Association between Comorbidity Indices and Functional Autonomy in Individuals with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
  • M.N. Temedda, A. Garnier-Crussard, C. Mouchoux, Virginie Dauphinot

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.