Abbonarsi

Liquid biopsy as a tool for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF baseline testing in metastatic colorectal cancer - 26/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102417 
Hampig Raphael Kourie a, , Joseph Zouein a, b, Ziad Zalaquett a, Alain Chebly c, d, Lewis Nasr a, Fadi El Karak a, Maroun Sadek e, Ousama Safar f, Mouin Fouani g, Nizar Bitar h, Kamal Kachmar i, Fady Nasr a, Fadi Farhat j, Jawad Makarem k, Joseph Kattan a, Julien Taieb l
a Hematology-Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Boulevard Alfred Naccache, Beirut, Lebanon 
b Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA 
c Jacques Loiselet Center for Medical Genetics and Genomics (CGGM), Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon 
d Higher Institute of Public Health, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon 
e Hematology-Oncology Department, Lebanese Hospital Geitaoui, Beirut, Lebanon 
f Dar Al Amal University Hospital, Bekaa, Lebanon 
g Saint George Hospital, Hadath, Lebanon 
h Sahel General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon 
i Tebnin Governmental Hospital, Bekaa, Lebanon 
j Mount Lebanon Hospital, Baabda, Lebanon 
k Al Jabal Hospital, Chouf, Lebanon 
l Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Highlights

Liquid biopsy using Idylla RT-PCR has a sensitivity of 62 % and a specificity of 93 % compared with tissue biopsy for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.
The most frequent mutations detected by liquid and tissue biopsy are KRAS (41 %), followed by NRAS (4 %) and BRAF (3 %).
No relationship was established between the presence of hepatic metastasis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, pulmonary metastasis or tumor localization and RAS status concordance between liquid and tissue biopsy.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abstract

Background

The absence of KRAS and NRAS gene mutations (RAS wild type) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is associated with a good response to targeted therapy with anti-EGFR receptor antibodies. The current gold standard for RAS mutational status identification is genetic testing on tissue biopsy samples.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the relevance of liquid biopsy as a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study also aimed to determine the concordance between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy.

Methods

This is a phase IV, observational, uncontrolled, non-comparative, non-randomized, open label study. RAS/BRAF status will be tested at baseline using tissue and liquid biopsy using the Idylla/Biocartis PCR-based device. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the RAS status based on liquid biopsy with the RAS status based on tissue biopsy.

Results

100 patients with mCRC were included in the study. 75 % of patients showed concordant results between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, while 25 % had discordant results. Liquid biopsy demonstrated a sensitivity of 62 % and a specificity of 93 %. The accuracy of liquid biopsy was 75 %, with a moderate agreement between the two tests. The most frequent mutations in concordant cases were in KRAS (41 %), followed by NRAS (4 %) and BRAF (3 %). Mutations were not detected in 42 % of tissue biopsy samples and 60 % of liquid biopsy samples. The presence of hepatic metastases did not significantly affect the concordance between the biopsy methods.

Conclusion

Liquid biopsy using the Idylla™ system showed a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in mCRC patients. Despite some discordant cases, liquid biopsy remains a promising alternative to tissue biopsy due to its non-invasiveness, ability to provide multiple samples, and better representation of tumor heterogeneity.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2024  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 48 - N° 8

Articolo 102417- Ottobre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The construction of a prognostic model by apoptosis-related genes to predict survival, immune landscape, and medication in cholangiocarcinoma
  • Peng Shen, Yinsheng Shi, Pengcheng Xu, Linbin Rao, Zhengfei Wang, Junjie Jiang, Meiling Weng
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in gastric or gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Rui Wu, Sijia Yuan, Yuxuan Wang, Yangli Nan, Zixiao Chen, Hong Yuan, Zixuan Wang, Zuojing Li, Dongsheng Zong

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.