Abbonarsi

Alfentanil versus fentanyl for emergency department rapid sequence induction with ketamine: A-FAKT, a pilot randomized trial - 10/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.027 
Yichen Zhang a, , Matthew Miller, MBChB, MSc(Hons) b, c, d, Alexander Buttfield, MBBS e, f, Brian Burns, MBChB, MSc b, g, h, i, Kimberley Lawrie, MBChB b, j, James Gaston, MBChB e, f, Ian Ferguson, MBChB, PhD a, b, j
a South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Warwick Farm, New South Wales, Australia 
b Aeromedical Operations, New South Wales Ambulance, Bankstown Aerodrome, New South Wales, Australia 
c Department of Anaesthesia, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia 
d St George and Sutherland Clinical Schools, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia 
e Emergency Department, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia 
f School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia 
g Emergency Department, Northern Beaches Hospital, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales, Australia 
h Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia 
i Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia 
j Emergency Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia 

Corresponding author at: South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, 1 Burnside Drive, Warwick Farm NSW 2170, Australia.South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South Wales1 Burnside DriveWarwick FarmNSW 2170Australia

Abstract

Background

Fentanyl is often administered during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia (RSI) in the emergency department (ED) to ameliorate the hypertensive response that may occur. Due to its more rapid onset, the use of alfentanil may be more consistent with both the onset time of the sedative and the commencement of laryngoscopy. As such, we compared the effect of alfentanil and fentanyl on post-induction hemodynamic changes when administered as part of a standardized induction regimen including ketamine and rocuronium in ED RSI.

Methods

This was a double-blind pilot randomized controlled trial of adult patients requiring RSI in the ED of three urban Australian hospitals. Patients were randomized to receive either alfentanil or fentanyl in addition to ketamine and rocuronium for RSI. Non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate were measured immediately before and at two, four, and six minutes after induction. The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least one post-induction systolic blood pressure outside the pre-specified range of 100-160mmHg (with adjustment for patients with baseline hypertension). Secondary outcomes included hypertension, hypotension, hypoxia, first-pass intubation success, 30-day mortality, and the pattern of hemodynamic changes.

Results

A total of 61 patients were included in the final analysis (31 in the alfentanil group and 30 in the fentanyl group). The primary outcome was met in 58% of the alfentanil group and 50% of the fentanyl group (difference 8%, 95% confidence interval: -17% to 33%). The 30-day mortality rate, first-pass success rate, and incidences of hypertension, hypotension, and hypoxia were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure or heart rate between the groups at any of the measured time-points.

Conclusion

Alfentanil and fentanyl produced comparable post-induction hemodynamic changes when used as adjuncts to ketamine in ED RSI. Future studies could consider comparing different dosages of these opioids.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Alfentanil, Fentanyl, Ketamine, Rapid sequence induction and intubation, Hypertension, Hypotension


Mappa


© 2024  The Authors. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 84

P. 25-32 - Ottobre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Temperature trajectories and mortality in hypothermic sepsis patients
  • Dongkwan Han, Seung Hyun Kang, Young Woo Um, Hee Eun Kim, Ji Eun Hwang, Jae Hyuk Lee, You Hwan Jo, Yoon Sun Jung, Hui Jai Lee
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Emergency department length of stay and re-presentation rates in patients with low back pain: A medical record review study
  • Xiaotian Xu, Qiuzhe Chen, Crystian B. Oliveira, Chris G. Maher, Gustavo C. Machado

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.