Abbonarsi

Optimal bowel diameter thresholds for diagnosing small bowel obstruction and surgical intervention with point-of-care ultrasound - 10/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.019 
Hamid Shokoohi a, , 1 , Nour Al Jalbout a , Gary D. Peksa b , Katherine Dickerson Mayes c , Brent A. Becker d, Keith S. Boniface e, Shadi Lahham f , Michael Secko g , Miromid Chavoshzadeh h, Timothy Jang i , Michael Gottlieb j
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 
b Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America 
c Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, WellSpan York Hospital, York, PA, United States of America 
e Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America 
f Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America 
g Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America 
h Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 
i Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor UCLA, CA, United States of America 
j Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: 125 Nashua Street, Suite 2424, Boston, MA, United States of America125 Nashua Street, Suite 2424BostonMAUnited States of America

Abstract

Objectives

A bowel diameter threshold of ≥2.5 cm, originally derived from the research using computed tomography, is frequently used for diagnosing small bowel obstruction (SBO) with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We sought to determine the optimal bowel diameter threshold for diagnosing SBO using POCUS and its accuracy in predicting surgical intervention.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis using individual patient-level data from a previous systematic review on POCUS for SBO diagnosis across five academic EDs. Patient data were collected, including imaging results, surgical findings, and final diagnosis. The measured diameter of the small bowel using POCUS was recorded. ROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were constructed to determine the optimal threshold for bowel diameter in predicting SBO diagnosis and surgical intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex and age.

Results

A total of 403 patients had individual patient-level data available, with 367 patients included in the final analysis. The most accurate bowel diameter overall for predicting SBO was 2.75 cm (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–0.81). A bowel diameter of ≤1.7 cm had 100% sensitivity with no miss rate, while a bowel diameter of ≥4 cm had 90.7% specificity in confirming SBO. Patients under 65 had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm versus 2.95 cm in patients over 65. Females had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm, while males had a value of 2.95 cm. There was no significant correlation between bowel diameter thresholds and surgical intervention.

Conclusion

A bowel diameter threshold of 2.75 cm on POCUS is more discriminative diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing SBO. Patients' age and sex may impact diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that tailored approaches may be needed.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Small bowel obstruction, Point-of-care ultrasound, Bowel diameter, Diagnostic accuracy, Surgical intervention, Emergency department


Mappa


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 84

P. 1-6 - Ottobre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Info for authors
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department
  • A. Brad Hall, Kayla Wilson, Steven Guggino, Fred Blind

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.