Abbonarsi

Impact of emergency medicine clinical pharmacist practitioner-driven sepsis antibiotic interventions - 19/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.012 
Aubrie Hammond, PharmD , 1 , Regan Porter, PharmD, Kevin E. Lynch, PharmD, Taylor H. Cason, PharmD, Patrick Passaretti, PharmD
 CaroMont Regional Medical Center, 2525 Court Dr, Gastonia, NC 28054, United States of America 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend administration of antimicrobials within the first hour of recognition of sepsis. Over the last decade, several studies have demonstrated improved time-to-antibiotic administration and antibiotic appropriateness when a pharmacist was involved in the care of patients with sepsis. To our knowledge, no studies evaluating the appropriate use of antibiotics in sepsis driven entirely by an Emergency Medicine (EM) Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner (CPP) have been published. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an EM CPP-driven protocol on antimicrobial interventions in patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

This was a retrospective comparison of patients with sepsis for whom antimicrobials were ordered in the ED without pharmacist intervention to patients whose antimicrobials were ordered by an EM CPP via a sepsis consult to pharmacy. An EM CPP reviewed individual patient profiles for pertinent historical admissions, culture data, and allergy profiles to guide antimicrobial selection for the suspected source of infection and entered orders under their scope of practice with formal documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). The primary objective of this study was to compare the rates of appropriate empiric antibiotic utilization in septic patients admitted from the ED pre- and post-protocol implementation. Secondary endpoints included the following, broadening of ED-initiated empiric antibiotics on hospital admission, time-to-antibiotic administration, in-hospital mortality, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) association with in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay.

Results

A total of 144 patients were included: 80 patients prescribed antibiotics without pharmacist intervention and 64 prescribed antibiotics by an EM CPP. Appropriate empiric antibiotic selection in the ED improved from 57.5% (46/80) to 86% (55/64) with EM CPP intervention (difference 28.5%; p < 0.01). Time-to-first antibiotic administration decreased by 64 min (p < 0.01). Administration of antibiotics within 60 min, broadening of antibiotics on admission, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ across groups.

Conclusions

In this small, single-center study, an EM Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner-driven protocol for patients with sepsis in the emergency department improved the rate of appropriate empiric antimicrobial selection and time-to-antibiotic administration.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

Timely and appropriate antibiotic administration improves outcomes of septic patients.
A CPP-driven protocol improves the rate of appropriate empiric antimicrobials for sepsis in the ED.
A CPP-driven protocol improves time-to-antibiotic administration in the ED.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Antibiotics, Clinical pharmacist practitioner, Clinical pharmacy services, Emergency department, Emergency medicine clinical pharmacist, Sepsis

Abbreviations : ED, EMR, CMS, EM, CPP, ICD, IDSA, REMS, SSC


Mappa


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 76

P. 24-28 - Febbraio 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Real-world comparison between mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Hyun Joon Kim, Dongwook Lee, Hyung Jun Moon, Dongkil Jeong, Tae Yong Shin, Sun In Hong, Hyun Jung Lee, The Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC) Investigators
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces
  • Kwame Tuffuor, Huifeng Su, Lesley Meng, Edieal Pinker, Asim Tarabar, Reinier Van Tonder, Chris Chmura, Vivek Parwani, Arjun K. Venkatesh, Rohit B. Sangal

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.