Abbonarsi

Generalizability of an EHR-network dataset to the United States for cardiovascular disease conditions: Comparison of Cerner real world data with the national inpatient sample - 11/08/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.009 
Nishant P. Shah, MD b, , Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH a, Courtney Page, MA b, Rosalia Blanco, MBA b, Ann Marie Navar, MD, PhD a
a Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 
b Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 

Reprint requests: Nishant P. Shah, MD, Duke Hospital North, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Suite 7400, Cubicle 13, Durham, NC 27710.Duke Hospital NorthDuke University School of Medicine2301 Erwin Road, Suite 7400, Cubicle 13DurhamNC27710

Riassunto

Background

Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from health systems are increasingly being combined for clinical research purposes. Yet, it remains unclear whether these large EHR data sources provide a representative assessment of national disease prevalence and treatment. To evaluate this, we compared Cerner RealWorldData (CRWD), a large EHR data source, to those seen in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 3 cardiovascular conditions (myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke.

Methods

Adult patients (age ≥18 years) hospitalized with MI, CHF, and stroke were identified in both CRWD (86 health systems) and the NIS (4,782 hospitals). Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, outcomes (length of stay and in-hospital mortality) and hospital type (teaching or nonteaching) were compared between NIS and CRWD patients.

Results

Of 86 health systems participating in CRWD, 33 were excluded for potential data quality issues which accounted for about 11% of hospitalizations in the dataset, leaving 53 for inclusion in analysis which accounted for about 89% of hospitalizations in the dataset. Between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018, 116,956 MI, 188,107 CHF, and 93,968 stroke hospitalizations were identified in CRWD vs 2,245,300 MI, 4,310,745 CHF, and 1,333,480 stroke hospitalizations in the NIS. Patient demographics were similar among patients in CWRD and the NIS for all 3 cardiovascular groups except for ethnicity, with underrepresentation of Hispanic individuals in CRWD vs the NIS. Patients hospitalized in CRWD had a slightly higher proportion of coded co-morbidities compared with NIS hospitalizations due to a longer potential look-back period. For patients with MI, hospital mortality, length of stay, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) rates, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates were similar between CRWD and NIS. Additionally, there was similar in hospital mortality and length of stay for those with CHF and stroke hospitalizations between CRWD and NIS.

Conclusions

On aggregate, characteristics of hospitalizations for MI, CHF, and stroke using EHR data from one nationwide EHR-derived database, CRWD, appears similar to characteristics of hospitalizations in the nationally representative NIS. Important limitations of CRWD include lack of geographic representativeness, under-representation of Hispanic adults, and the need to exclude health systems for missing data.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 263

P. 64-72 - Settembre 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Coronary angiography-derived index for assessing microcirculatory resistance in patients with non-obstructed vessels: The FLASH IMR study
  • Dong Huang, Yanjun Gong, Yongzhen Fan, Bo Zheng, Zhibing Lu, Jianping Li, Yunlong Huo, Javier Escaned, Yong Huo, Junbo Ge
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Ultrathin-strut vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for multi and single-stent lesions: A lesion-level subgroup analysis of 2 randomized trials
  • Jonas D. Häner, Miklos Rohla, Sylvain Losdat, Juan F. Iglesias, Olivier Muller, Eric Eeckhout, David Kurz, Daniel Weilenmann, Christoph Kaiser, Maxime Tapponnier, Marco Roffi, Dik Heg, Stephan Windecker, Thomas Pilgrim

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.