Abbonarsi

Comparative effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in asthma: A target trial emulation - 04/05/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.020 
Ayobami T. Akenroye, MBChB, MPH, PhD a, b, c, , Jodi B. Segal, MD, MPH c, d, e, Guohai Zhou, PhD f, Dinah Foer, MD a, g, Lily Li, MD a, G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS c, d, e, Corinne A. Keet, MD, PhD h, John W. Jackson, ScD c, e, i, j
a Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass 
b Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass 
g Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass 
c Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
e Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
i Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
j Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
d Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 
f Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
h Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 

Corresponding author: Ayobami T. Akenroye, MBChB, MPH, PhD, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115.Division of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyBrigham and Women’s Hospital60 Fenwood RdBostonMA02115

Abstract

Background

Multiple mAbs are currently approved for the treatment of asthma. However, there is limited evidence on their comparative effectiveness.

Objective

Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in individuals with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Methods

We emulated a hypothetical randomized trial using electronic health records from a large US-based academic health care system. Participants aged 18 years or older with baseline IgE levels between 30 and 700 IU/mL and peripheral eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells/μL were eligible for study inclusion. The study period extended from March 2016 to August 2021. Outcomes included the incidence of asthma-related exacerbations and change in baseline FEV1 value over 12 months of follow-up.

Results

In all, 68 individuals receiving dupilumab, 68 receiving omalizumab, and 65 receiving mepolizumab met the inclusion criteria. Over 12 months of follow-up, 31 exacerbations occurred over 68 person years (0.46 exacerbations per person year) in the dupilumab group, 63 over 68 person years (0.93 per person year) in the omalizumab group, and 86 over 65 person years (1.32 per person year) in the mepolizumab group (adjusted incidence rate ratios: dupilumab vs mepolizumab, 0.28 [95% CI = 0.09-0.84]; dupilumab vs omalizumab, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.12-1.09]; and omalizumab vs mepolizumab, 0.78 [95% CI = 0.32-1.91]). The differences in the change in FEV1 comparing patients who received the different biologics were as follows: 0.11 L (95% CI = –0.003 to 0.222 L) for dupilumab versus mepolizumab, 0.082 L (95% CI –0.040 to 0.204 L) for dupilumab versus omalizumab, and 0.026 L (95% CI –0.083 to 0.140 L) for omalizumab versus mepolizumab.

Conclusions

Among patients with asthma and eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells/μL and IgE levels of 30 to 700 kU/L, dupilumab was associated with greater improvements in exacerbation and FEV1 value than omalizumab and mepolizumab.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Asthma, comparative effectiveness, mAbs, target trial emulation, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, eosinophilic, allergic

Abbreviations used : ASMD, COVID-19, HR, ICD-9, ICD-10, IQR, IRR, RPDR


Mappa


 Supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) program K99/R00 MOSAIC (grant K99MD015767 [to A.T.A.]), a Brigham and Women’s Hospital Minority Faculty Career Development Award (to A.T.A.), NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (grant K23HL161332 [to D.F.]), the NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (grant K23AI163371 [to L.L.]), the NIH/NHLBI (grant K01HL145320 [to J.W.J.]), the NIH/National Institute on Aging (NIA) (K24AG049036 [to J.B.S.]).
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: G. C. Alexander is past chair; in addition, he is a current member of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Peripheral and Central Nervous System Advisory Committee and a cofounding principal and equity holder in Monument Analytics, a health care consultancy whose clients include the life sciences industry as well as plaintiffs in opioid litigation, and a past member of OptumRx’s National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. J. B. Segal has received unrelated grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and has conducted unrelated consultancy for Sanofi and Provention Bio. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2023  The Authors. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 151 - N° 5

P. 1269-1276 - Maggio 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Phospholipid remodeling and its derivatives are associated with COVID-19 severity
  • Juntong Wei, Xiaoyu Liu, Weimin Xiao, Jiahua Lu, Li Guan, Zhangfu Fang, Jiaping Chen, Baoqing Sun, Zongwei Cai, Xizhuo Sun, Hua-Ling Chen, Nanshan Zhong, Zhigang Liu, Jun Yang, Xiaojun Xiao, Shau-Ku Huang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • IL-13–associated epithelial remodeling correlates with clinical severity in nasal polyposis
  • Maya E. Kotas, Neil N. Patel, Emily K. Cope, Jose G. Gurrola, Andrew N. Goldberg, Steven D. Pletcher, Max A. Seibold, Camille M. Moore, Erin D. Gordon

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.