Abbonarsi

Fiabilité des ultrasons préopératoires à contraste amélioré (CEUS) dans les pseudarthroses des os longs pour le diagnostic microbiologique des biopsies tissulaires comparées aux sonications sur matériel - 23/08/22

Preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of long bone nonunions reliably predicts microbiology of tissue culture samples but not of implant-sonication

Doi : 10.1016/j.rcot.2021.02.017 
Ulrike Dapunt a, b, c, , Yina Zhao a, Gerhard Schmidmaier a, c, Christian Fischer a, c
a Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Allemagne 
b Ultrasound Center, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg, Allemagne 
c HTRG–Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg, Allemagne 

Auteur correspondant.

Abstract

Introduction

Bacterial infection in the context of fracture repair remains a severe complication in trauma surgery and may result in long bone nonunion. Since treatment options for aseptic and infected nonunions vary greatly, diagnostic methods should ideally differentiate between these two entities as accurately as possible. Recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been introduced as a preoperative imaging technique to evaluate hypervascularity at the fracture site as sign of bacterial infection.

Hypothesis

Preoperative CEUS predicts results of microbiological evaluation obtained either by culture of tissue samples or by analyzing the sonication fluid following removal and sonication of the implant.

Patients and methods

Over the course of 6 months, 26 patients with long bone nonunions were included in this study. Patients’ clinical data were evaluated. Tissue samples were collected intraoperatively and examined by standard microbiological techniques. The sonication method was applied to removed implants. Additionally, 1–3 days before surgery, CEUS was performed to determine hypervascularity at the nonunion site as a possible parameter for infection.

Results

Culture of tissue samples indicated infection in 50% of cases and implant sonication in 57.7% of cases. However, there was merely a fair agreement (κ=0.231) between these two diagnostic methods. CEUS predicted results of tissue culture reliably (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 100%), whereas implant sonication showed no significant correlations with results from CEUS. Hypertrophic and atrophic nonunions were evaluated separately to determine possible differences in vascularity. We found that contrast peak enhancement of CEUS was similar in atrophic and hypertrophic nonunions with positive culture of tissue samples. Both differed significantly from culture negative cases (p=0.0016 and 0.0062). Results of implant-sonication positive or negative cases in atrophic and hypertrophic nonunions, however, were less clear and could be misleading.

Discussion

We were able to confirm CEUS as a valuable preoperative diagnostic tool that reliably predicts microbiology of tissue culture samples, but not of implant sonication.

Level of evidence

I; diagnostic study.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Long bone nonunion, Biofilm, Implant-associated infection, Sonication



 Cet article peut être consulté in extenso dans la version anglaise de la revue Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research sur Science Direct (sciencedirect.com) en utilisant le DOI ci-dessus.


© 2021  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 108 - N° 5

P. 545 - Settembre 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Fractures diaphysaires fémorales traitées par enclouage centromédullaire antérograde à foyer fermé – Évaluation par imagerie stéréoriographique EOS des cals vicieux en rotation ayant une conséquence fonctionnelle
  • Julien Boscher, Armand Alain, Guillaume Vergnenegre, Vincent Hummel, Jean-Louis Charissoux, Pierre-Sylvain Marcheix
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Fractures de la diaphyse humérale : résultats de l’enclouage antérograde percutané par clou Telegraph® long avec verrouillage distal dynamique
  • Amine El Ghazoui, Jamal Haddaoui, El Mostafa Zahar, Noureddine Sekkach

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.