Abbonarsi

Patterns of opioid prescribing in emergency departments during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic - 14/05/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.040 
Tucker Lurie, MD a, , Naomi Bonnin, BS b, Jeffrey Rea, MD c, d, e , Gurshawn Tuteja, BS f , Zachary Dezman, MD, MS, MS c, d , R. Gentry Wilkerson, MD c, d , Adelina Buganu, MD c, d, Rose Chasm, MD c, d , Daniel J. Haase, MD c, d, e , Quincy K. Tran, MD, PhD c, d, e, g
a Wellspan York Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1001 South George Street, York, PA, 17403, USA 
b University of Maryland Global Campus, 1616 McCormick Dr, Largo, MD 20774, USA 
c University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
e Program in Trauma, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
f Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912, USA 
g The Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine & Critical Care, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, suite P1G01, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 

Corresponding author at: 1001 South George Street, York, PA 17403, USA.1001 South George StreetYorkPA17403USA

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic was superimposed upon an ongoing epidemic of opioid use disorder and overdose deaths. Although the trend of opioid prescription patterns (OPP) had decreased in response to public health efforts before the pandemic, little is known about the OPP from emergency department (ED) clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a pre-post study of adult patients who were discharged from 13 EDs and one urgent care within our academic medical system between 01/01/2019 and 09/30/2020 using an interrupted time series (ITS) approach. Patient characteristics and prescription data were extracted from the single unified electronic medical record across all study sites. Prescriptions of opioids were converted into morphine equivalent dose (MED). We compared the “Covid-19 Pandemic” period (C19, 03/29/2020–9/30/2020) and the “Pre-Pandemic” period (PP, 1/19/202003/28/2020). We used a multivariate logistic regression to assess clinical factors associated with opioid prescriptions.

Results

We analyzed 361,794 ED visits by adult patients, including 259,242 (72%) PP and 102,552 (28%) C19 visits. Demographic information and percentages of patients receiving opioid prescriptions were similar in both groups. The median [IQR] MED per prescription was higher for C19 patients (70 [56–90]) than for PP patients (60 [60–90], P < 0.001). ITS demonstrated a significant trend toward higher MED prescription per ED visit during the pandemic (coefficient 0.11, 95% CI 0.05–0.16, P = 0.002). A few factors, that were associated with lower likelihood of opioid prescriptions before the pandemic, became non-significant during the pandemic.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that emergency clinicians increased the prescribed amount of opioids per prescription during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Etiologies for this finding could include lack of access to primary care and other specialties during the pandemic, or lower volumes allowing for emergency clinicians to identify who is safe to be prescribed opioids.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Opioid prescriptions, COVID-19 pandemic, Interrupted time series

Abbreviations : COVID-19, ED, CDC, PDMP, HOPE, OUD, UMMS, EHR, SQL, ESI, ICD-10, MED, IQR, ITS, VIF, AUROC


Mappa


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 56

P. 63-70 - Giugno 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Validation of a simplified comorbidity evaluation predicting clinical outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 – A multicenter retrospective observation study
  • James P. d'Etienne, Naomi Alanis, Eric Chou, John S. Garrett, Jessica J. Kirby, David P. Bryant, Sajid Shaikh, Chet D. Schrader, Hao Wang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Utility of non-invasive synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Bora Cekmen, Busra Bildik, Oner Bozan, Seref Emre Atis, Serkan Dogan, Abdullah Osman Kocak

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.