Abbonarsi

Natural language processing of head CT reports to identify intracranial mass effect: CTIME algorithm - 09/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.001 
Alexandra June Gordon, MD a, , Imon Banerjee, Ph.D. b , Jason Block, MD c , Christopher Winstead-Derlega, MD, MPH d, Jennifer G. Wilson, MD, MS a , Tsuyoshi Mitarai, MD a , Michael Jarrett, MBA e , Josh Sanyal f , Daniel L. Rubin, MD, MS f , Max Wintermark, MD, MAS, MBA g , Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPP h
a Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Critical Care, Stanford, CA, United States of America 
b Emory University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Radiology Georgia Tech, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, United States of America 
c Stanford University, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, Stanford, CA, United States of America 
d Duke University, Division of Emergency Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America 
e QuesGen Systems, Inc., Burlingame, CA, United States of America 
f Stanford University, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America 
g Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Stanford, CA, United States of America 
h Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine UCSF, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stanford, CA, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Critical Care, Stanford University, School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road Suite 350, Stanford, CA, United States of America.Department of Emergency MedicineCritical Care, Stanford UniversitySchool of Medicine900 Welch Road Suite 350StanfordCAUnited States of America

Abstract

Background

The Mortality Probability Model (MPM) is used in research and quality improvement to adjust for severity of illness and can also inform triage decisions. However, a limitation for its automated use or application is that it includes the variable “intracranial mass effect” (IME), which requires human engagement with the electronic health record (EHR). We developed and tested a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify IME from CT head reports.

Methods

We obtained initial CT head reports from adult patients who were admitted to the ICU from our ED between 10/2013 and 9/2016. Each head CT head report was labeled yes/no IME by at least two of five independent labelers. The reports were then randomly divided 80/20 into training and test sets. All reports were preprocessed to remove linguistic and style variability, and a dictionary was created to map similar common terms. We tested three vectorization strategies: Term Frequency-Inverse Document frequency (TF-IDF), Word2Vec, and Universal Sentence Encoder to convert the report text to a numerical vector. This vector served as the input to a classification-tree-based ensemble machine learning algorithm (XGBoost). After training, model performance was assessed in the test set using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We also divided the continuous range of scores into positive/inconclusive/negative categories for IME.

Results

Of the 1202 CT reports in the training set, 308 (25.6%) reports were manually labeled as “yes” for IME. Of the 355 reports in the test set, 108 (30.4%) were labeled as “yes” for IME. The TF-IDF vectorization strategy as an input for the XGBoost model had the best AUROC:-- 0.9625 (95% CI 0.9443–0.9807). TF-IDF score categories were defined and had the following likelihood ratios: “positive” (TF-IDF score > 0.5) LR = 24.59; “inconclusive” (TF-IDF 0.05–0.5) LR = 0.99; and “negative” (TF-IDF < 0.05) LR = 0.05. 82% of reports were classified as either “positive” or “negative”. In the test set, only 4 of 199 (2.0%) reports with a “negative” classification were false negatives and only 8 of 93 (8.6%) reports classified as “positive” were false positives.

Conclusion

NLP can accurately identify IME from free-text reports of head CTs in approximately 80% of records, adequate to allow automatic calculation of MPM based on EHR data for many applications.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Emergency critical care, Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence, Hospital mortality


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 51

P. 388-392 - Gennaio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Emergent cardiac outcomes in patients with normal electrocardiograms in the emergency department
  • Leigha J. Winters, Ramandeep K. Dhillon, Gurjit K. Pannu, Patrick Terrassa, James F. Holmes, Mary L. Bing
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Point of Care Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Necrotizing Fasciitis
  • Shadi Lahham, Inna Shniter, Monica Desai, Rana Andary, Soheil Saadat, John C. Fox, Scott Pierce

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.