Abbonarsi

Patient controlled analgesia for the management of acute pain in the emergency department: A systematic review - 09/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.042 
Linda Papa, MDCM, MSc a, b, , Lindsay Maguire, MD a, Mark Bender, MD a, Michael Boyd, MD a, Sagar Patel, MD a, Ivan Samcam, MD a
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, 86 W Underwood, Orlando, FL 32806, United States of America 
b Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 Rue University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada 

Corresponding author at: Academic Clinical Research and Attending Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, 86 W. Underwood (S-200), Orlando, FL 32806, United States of America.Academic Clinical Research and Attending Emergency PhysicianDepartment of Emergency MedicineOrlando Regional Medical Center86 W. Underwood (S-200)OrlandoFL32806United States of America

Abstract

Background

The most common presenting complaint to the emergency department (ED) is pain. Several studies have shown that a large proportion of ED patients either receive no or sub-optimal analgesia. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps used in the post-operative setting has shown to decrease total opioid consumption and has increased patient and nurse satisfaction.

Objective

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate clinical trials that have used PCAs in the ED setting, to evaluate safety and efficacy as well as patient and healthcare provider experience.

Methods

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database was conducted using the MESH search terms emergency department, patient-controlled analgesia, and acute pain up to September 2021. These terms were searched in all fields of publication and were limited to the English-language articles, clinical “human” studies, and studies that included the use of patient-controlled analgesia in the setting of the emergency department.

Results

The search initially identified 227 potentially relevant articles and a total of 10 studies met criteria for inclusion. ED use of PCA therapy was associated with increased patient satisfaction, decreased pain scores, and an overall increase in opioid consumption.

Conclusion

The quality, the differences in study methods and outcome measures used, and heterogeneity of the studies performed to date do not provide adequate evidence to support its widespread use in the ED. Well-designed studies conducted in the ED are still needed to evaluate the ideal patient population to whom these PCAs may provide the most benefit as well as a robust cost-analysis to ensure feasibility of use in the future.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

Emergency Department use of PCA therapy is associated with increased patient satisfaction, decreased pain scores, and an overall increase in opioid consumption.
Current studies on the topic show inconsistencies in these findings, as well as important differences in study methods and outcome measures used.
The quality and heterogeneity of the studies performed to date do not provide adequate evidence to support its widespread use of patient-controlled analgesia in the emergency department.
Well-designed studies conducted in the emergency department are needed to evaluate the ideal patient population to whom these PCAs may provide the most benefit as well as a robust cost-analysis to ensure feasibility of use in the future.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Pain, Analgesia, Patient-controlled analgesia, Emergency department, PCA pump, Opioids, Patient satisfaction


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 51

P. 228-238 - Gennaio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Efficacy of topical tranexamic acid in epistaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Rajesh Naidu Janapala, Quincy K. Tran, Jigar Patel, Esha Mehta, Ali Pourmand
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Intravenous diltiazem versus metoprolol for atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate: A meta-analysis
  • Qingsu Lan, Fengchao Wu, Bing Han, Lanhu Ma, Junxian Han, Yali Yao

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.