Abbonarsi

Early detection of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at high risk of clinical deterioration: Utility of emergency department shock index - 29/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.049 
Inge H.T. van Rensen, MD a, , Kirsten R.C. Hensgens, MD a, b , Anita W. Lekx, MD a , Frits H.M. van Osch, PhD c, d , Lieve H.H. Knarren, MD e , Vivian E.M. van Kampen-van den Boogaart, MD, PhD f , Jannet D.J. Mehagnoul-Schipper, MD, PhD b , Caroline E. Wyers, PhD d, e, g , Joop P. van den Bergh, Prof, MD, PhD d, e, g , Dennis G. Barten, MD a
a VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Venlo, the Netherlands 
b VieCuri Medical Center, Intensive Care Unit, Venlo, the Netherlands 
c VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Venlo, the Netherlands 
d Maastricht University Medical Center, School of Nutrition and Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands 
e VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Venlo, the Netherlands 
f VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Pulmonology, Venlo, the Netherlands 
g Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht, the Netherlands 

Corresponding author at: VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands.VieCuri Medical CenterDepartment of Emergency MedicineTegelseweg 210Venlo5912 BLThe Netherlands

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 outbreak has put an unprecedented strain on Emergency Departments (EDs) and other critical care resources. Early detection of patients that are at high risk of clinical deterioration and require intensive monitoring, is key in ED evaluation and disposition. A rapid and easy risk-stratification tool could aid clinicians in early decision making. The Shock Index (SI: heart rate/systolic blood pressure) proved useful in detecting hemodynamic instability in sepsis and myocardial infarction patients. In this study we aim to determine whether SI is discriminative for ICU admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Retrospective, observational, single-center study. All patients ≥18 years old who were hospitalized with COVID-19 (defined as: positive result on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test) between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included for analysis. Data were collected from electronic medical patient records and stored in a protected database. ED shock index was calculated and analyzed for its discriminative value on in-hospital mortality and ICU admission by a ROC curve analysis.

Results

In total, 411 patients were included. Of all patients 249 (61%) were male. ICU admission was observed in 92 patients (22%). Of these, 37 patients (40%) died in the ICU. Total in-hospital mortality was 28% (114 patients). For in-hospital mortality the optimal cut-off SI ≥ 0.86 was not discriminative (AUC 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43–0.56)), with a sensitivity of 12.3% and specificity of 93.6%. For ICU admission the optimal cut-off SI ≥ 0.57 was also not discriminative (AUC 0.56 (95% CI: 0.49–0.62)), with a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 34.2%.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, SI measured at ED presentation was not discriminative for ICU admission and was not useful for early identification of patients at risk of clinical deterioration.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : COVID-19, SARS-COV-2, Shock index, Emergency department, Triage


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 49

P. 76-79 - Novembre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Does a short intervention with vibration foam roller recover lifeguards better after a water rescue? A pilot study
  • Alejandra Alonso-Calvete, Antón Lage-Rey, Miguel Lorenzo-Martínez, Ezequiel Rey
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Theoretical knowledge and skill retention 3 and 6 months after a European Newborn Life Support provider course
  • Styliani Paliatsiou, Theodoros Xanthos, Jonathan Wyllie, Paraskevi Volaki, Rozeta Sokou, Danai Bikouli, Zoi Iliodromiti, Theodora Boutsikou, Nicoletta Iacovidou

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.