Abbonarsi

Exposure and confidence across critical airway procedures in pediatric emergency medicine: An international survey study - 24/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.075 
Joshua Nagler, MD MHPEd a, b, c, , Marc Auerbach, MD MSCI d, e, Michael C. Monuteaux, ScD a, b, John A. Cheek, MBBS f, g, h, Franz E. Babl, MD MPH f, g, h, i, Ed Oakley, MBBS f, g, h, i, Lucia Nguyen, MBBS j, Arjun Rao, MBBS MAppSci h, k, l, m, Sarah Dalton, BMed MMgtHlth h, n, Mark D. Lyttle, MBCHB o, p, q, Santiago Mintegi, MD, PhD r, s, t, u, Rakesh D. Mistry, MD, MS e, v, Andrew Dixon, MD w, x, y, z, Pedro Rino, MD aa, ab, ac, Guillermo Kohn-Loncarica, MD aa, ab, ac, Stuart R. Dalziel, MBChB PhD h, ad, ae, Simon Craig, MHPE MPH h, af, ag

the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN)1

  Participating networks include: the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics (PEM-CRC), Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC), Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI), Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM), and Red de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediátrica Latinoaméricana (RIDEPLA).

a Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
b Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 
c Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), USA 
d Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA 
e Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEM-CRC), USA 
f Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
g Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
h Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Australia and New Zealand 
i University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
j Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia 
k Sydney Children's Hospital (Randwick), NSW, Australia 
l University of New South Wales, Australia 
m Health Education Training Institute (HETI), New South Wales, Australia 
n The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia 
o Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK 
p Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK 
q Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom & Ireland (PERUKI), UK 
r Pediatric Emergency Department, Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain 
s University of the Basque Country, Spain 
t Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM), Spain 
u Red de Investigación de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría/Spanish Pediatric Emergency Research Group (RISeuP/SPERG), Spain 
v Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA 
w University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
x Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
y Women's and Children's Health Research Institute, Canada 
z Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC), Canada 
aa Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
ab Hospital de Pediatría “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
ac Red de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediátrica Latinoamericana (RIDEPLA), Argentina 
ad Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 
ae Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 
af Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia 
ag Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.Division of Emergency MedicineBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02115USA

Abstract

Background

Airway management procedures are critical for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, but rarely performed skills in pediatric patients. Worldwide experience with respect to frequency and confidence in performing airway management skills has not been previously described.

Objectives

Our aims were 1) to determine the frequency with which emergency medicine physicians perform airway procedures including: bag-mask ventilation (BMV), endotracheal intubation (ETI), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, tracheostomy tube change (TTC), and surgical airways, and 2) to investigate predictors of procedural confidence regarding advanced airway management in children.

Methods

A web-based survey of senior emergency physicians was distributed through the six research networks associated with Pediatric Emergency Research Network (PERN). Senior physician was defined as anyone working without direct supervision at any point in a 24-h cycle. Physicians were queried regarding their most recent clinical experience performing or supervising airway procedures, as well as with hands on practice time or procedural teaching. Reponses were dichotomized to within the last year, or ≥ 1 year. Confidence was assessed using a Likert scale for each procedure, with results for ETI and LMA stratified by age. Response levels were dichotomized to “not confident” or “confident.” Multivariate regression models were used to assess relevant associations.

Results

1602 of 2446 (65%) eligible clinicians at 96 PERN sites responded. In the previous year, 1297 (85%) physicians reported having performed bag-mask ventilation, 900 (59%) had performed intubation, 248 (17%) had placed a laryngeal mask airway, 348 (23%) had changed a tracheostomy tube, and 18 (1%) had performed a surgical airway. Of respondents, 13% of physicians reported the opportunity to supervise but not provide ETI, 5% for LMA and 5% for BMV. The percentage of physicians reporting “confidence” in performing each procedure was: BMV (95%) TTC (43%), and surgical airway (16%). Clinician confidence in ETT and LMA varied by patient age. Supervision of an airway procedure was the strongest predictor of procedural confidence across airway procedures.

Conclusion

BMV and ETI were the most commonly performed pediatric airway procedures by emergency medicine physicians, and surgical airways are very infrequent. Supervising airway procedures may serve to maintain procedural confidence for physicians despite infrequent opportunities as the primary proceduralist.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 42

P. 70-77 - Aprile 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
  • Daniel Martin Simadibrata, Julius Calvin, Alya Darin Wijaya, Naufal Arkan Abiyyu Ibrahim
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on visits of an urban emergency department
  • Gül?ah Ç?kr?kç? I??k, Yunsur Çevik

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.