Abbonarsi

Age and eczema severity, but not family history, are major risk factors for peanut allergy in infancy - 04/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.033 
Corinne Keet, MD, PhD a, b, , Michael Pistiner, MD, MMSc c, Mihaela Plesa, BA a, Daria Szelag, DNP, CRNP a, Wayne Shreffler, MD, PhD c, Robert Wood, MD a, Joan Dunlop, MD a, Roger Peng, PhD d, Jennifer Dantzer, MD a, Alkis Togias, MD e
a Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 
b Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
c Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
d Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md 
e Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md 

Corresponding author: Corinne Keet, MD, PhD, Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St, Ste 1102, Baltimore, MD 21218.Pediatric AllergyImmunology and RheumatologyJohns Hopkins School of Medicine600 N. Wolfe StSte 1102BaltimoreMD21218

Abstract

Background

Whether to screen high-risk groups before early peanut introduction is controversial.

Objective

We sought to determine the risk of peanut allergy (PA) before peanut introduction for infants with (1) moderate-severe eczema, (2) another food allergy (FA), and/or (3) a first-degree relative with peanut allergy (FH).

Methods

Infants aged 4 to 11 months with no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and at least 1 of the above risk factors received peanut skin prick test and, depending on skin prick test wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding.

Results

A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males); 78 had eczema only, 11 FA only, 107 FH only, and 125 had multiple risk factors. Overall, 18% of 195 with eczema, 19% of 59 with FA, and 4% of 201 with FH had PA. Only 1% of 115 with FH and no eczema had PA. Among those with eczema, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68 per month), higher SCORing Atopic Dermatitis score (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34 per 5 points), black (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.92-17.4 compared with white), or Asian race (OR, 6.98; 95% CI, 1.92-25.44) and suspected or diagnosed other FA (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.62-9.80) were associated with PA.

Conclusions

PA is common in infants with moderate-severe eczema, whereas FH without eczema is not a major risk factor, suggesting screening only in those with significant eczema. Even within the first year of life, introduction at later ages is associated with a higher risk of PA among those with eczema, supporting introduction of peanut as early as possible.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Graphical abstract




Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Food allergy, peanut allergy, prevention, early introduction

Abbreviations used : LEAP, NIAID, OFC, OR, SCORAD, SPT


Mappa


 Disclaimer: Dr Togias’ authorship of this report does not constitute endorsement by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or any other US government agency.
 This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant no. 1U01AI125290). This publication was made possible by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), which is funded in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) (grant no. UL1 TR003098), a component of the NIH, and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Johns Hopkins ICTR, NCATS, or NIH. The project described was supported by grant number 1UL1TR002541-01. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources, the NCATS, or the NIH. J.D. is funded by the Pearl M. Stetler Fund.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: C. Keet receives royalties from Up to Date. M. Pistiner has served as a consultant for AAFA, kaléo, and DBV Technologies; received funding from kaléo, DBV Technologies, and National Peanut Board; and is cofounder of AllergyHome and Allergy Certified Training. W. Shreffler has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Aimmune Therapeutics, and as an advisor to Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), Buhlmann Laboratories AG, and Sanofi Pasteur. R. Wood receives research support from FARE, Aimmune, DBV, Astellas, Regeneron, Sanofi, and HAL-Allergy, and royalties from Up to Date. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2020  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 147 - N° 3

P. 984 - Marzo 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Ara h 2–specific IgE is superior to whole peanut extract–based serology or skin prick test for diagnosis of peanut allergy in infancy
  • Corinne Keet, Mihaela Plesa, Daria Szelag, Wayne Shreffler, Robert Wood, Joan Dunlop, Roger Peng, Jennifer Dantzer, Robert G. Hamilton, Alkis Togias, Michael Pistiner
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Epicutaneous immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy: Follow-up from the Consortium for Food Allergy Research
  • Amy M. Scurlock, A. Wesley Burks, Scott H. Sicherer, Donald Y.M. Leung, Edwin H. Kim, Alice K. Henning, Peter Dawson, Robert W. Lindblad, M. Cecilia Berin, Christine B. Cho, Wendy F. Davidson, Marshall Plaut, Hugh A. Sampson, Robert A. Wood, Stacie M. Jones, Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR)

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.