Abbonarsi

Intralymphatic immunotherapy improves grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A 3-year randomized placebo-controlled trial - 04/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.002 
Søren Helbo Skaarup, MD a, Johannes Martin Schmid, MD, PhD a, Tina Skjold, MD, PhD a, Ole Graumann, MD, PhD b, c, Hans Jürgen Hoffmann, PhD a, d,
a Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark 
b Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark 
c Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark 
d Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark 

Corresponding author: Hans Jürgen Hoffmann, PhD, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Allé 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.Department of Respiratory Medicine and AllergyAarhus University HospitalPalle Juul-Jensens Allé 99Aarhus N8200Denmark

Abstract

Background

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is a global health problem. Different allergen immunotherapy regimes are marketed but have low adherence because they are expensive, complex, and time-consuming. New allergen immunotherapy forms are needed.

Objective

In a 3-year follow-up double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of intralymphatic allergen immunotherapy (ILIT).

Methods

Patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were treated with 3 ILIT injections and an ILIT booster 1 year later, 3 ILIT injections and a placebo booster, or 3 placebo injections and a placebo booster. Primary outcome was improvement in a combined symptom and medication score (cSMS). A novel evaluation tool with a linear regression model of cSMS and grass pollen counts was developed. Secondary outcomes were changes in grass specific immunoglobulins and skin and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen.

Results

A total of 36 patients were included. Log10-transformed cSMS was reduced by 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.49; P = .002), equaling 48.5% (95% CI, 24.5%-62%), in the entire 3-year follow-up period, significant only in the first follow-up season but not in the second and third seasons. The regression model showed a 37% (P < .001) reduction in cSMS. The booster injection 1 year later had no additional effect. Secondary, repeated measures of IgE and IgG4 to grass showed significant between-group difference and within-group change in the ILIT groups. No change in provocation test results was found.

Conclusions

ILIT gives a substantial reduction in grass pollen allergy symptoms and use of rescue medication, significant in the first season after treatment. A booster injection had no additional effect.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Graphical abstract




Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergen immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy, ultrasound-guided injections, combined symptom medication score, outcome parameters

Abbreviations used : AIT, cSMS, ILIT, log-SMS, SLIT


Mappa


 The trial was funded by a Danish governmental research fund from the Central Denmark Region, Denmark and by a grant from the Toyota Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2020  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 147 - N° 3

P. 1011-1019 - Marzo 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab for idiopathic anaphylaxis
  • Melody C. Carter, Irina Maric, Erica H. Brittain, Yun Bai, Keith Lumbard, Hyejeong Bolan, Daly Cantave, Linda M. Scott, Dean D. Metcalfe
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • A 300 IR sublingual tablet is an effective, safe treatment for house dust mite–induced allergic rhinitis: An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial
  • Pascal Demoly, Jonathan Corren, Peter Creticos, Frédéric De Blay, Philippe Gevaert, Peter Hellings, Krzysztof Kowal, Martine Le Gall, Natalia Nenasheva, Giovanni Passalacqua, Oliver Pfaar, Miguel Tortajada-Girbés, Carmen Vidal, Margitta Worm, Thomas B. Casale

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.