Abbonarsi

iPhone App compared with standard blood pressure measurement –The iPARR trial - 18/02/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.003 
Marcus Dörr, MD, PhD a, b, , Stefan Weber, MD, PhD c, , Ralf Birkemeyer, MD d, Licia Leonardi, MD e, Clemens Winterhalder, MD e, Christina J. Raichle, MD f, Noé Brasier, MD g, Thilo Burkard, MD h, i, , # , Jens Eckstein, MD, PhD e, g, #
a Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Greifswald, Germany 
b DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany 
c Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany 
d Department of Internal Medicine, University Ulm, Germany 
e Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland 
f Departement of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland 
g CMIO Office, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland 
h Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland 
i Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland 

Corresponding author: Thilo Burkard, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland, +41 61 5565430 (phone), +41 61 265 46 04 (fax), (email)Thilo Burkard, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland, +41 61 328 7738 (phone), +41 61 265 46 04 (fax), (email)

Riassunto

Background

The possibility to use built-in smartphone-cameras for photoplethysmographic (PPG) recording of pulse waves lead to the release of numerous health apps, claiming to measure blood pressure (BP) based on PPG signals. Even though these apps are highly popular, not a single one is clinically validated. Aim of the current study was to test systolic BP (sBP) estimation by a promising new algorithm in a large clinical setting.

Methods

The study was designed based on the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Each individual received 7 sequential BP measurements, starting with the reference device - an automated oscillometric cuff device - followed by the PPG recording at the patients' index finger.

Results

A total 1,036 subjects were recruited of which 965 could be included for final analysis leading to 2,895 pairs of comparison. Mean (±SD) error between test and reference device was -0.41 (±16.52) mmHg. Only 38.1% of all 2,895 BP comparisons reached a delta within ±5 mmHg, while 29.3% reached a delta larger than 15 mmHg. Bland-Altman plot showed an overestimation of smartphone sBP in comparison to reference sBP in low range and an underestimation in high sBP range.

Conclusions

According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 specifications the algorithm failed validation criteria for sBP measurement and was not commercialized. These findings emphasize that health apps should be rigorously validated according to common guidelines before market release as under- and/or overestimation of BP is potentially exposing persons at health risks in short and long term.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02552030.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2020  The Author(s). Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 233

P. 102-108 - Marzo 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Risk markers of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease
  • Maria Tomasdottir, Claes Held, Nermin Hadziosmanovic, Johan Westerbergh, Johan Lindbäck, Philip E. Aylward, Andrzej Budaj, Christopher P. Cannon, Johan Engdahl, Christopher B. Granger, Wolfgang Koenig, Athanasios J. Manolis, Jonas Oldgren, Ralph A.H. Stewart, Emma Svennberg, Dragos Vinereanu, Harvey D. White, Agneta Siegbahn, Lars Wallentin, Ziad Hijazi
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study
  • Benjamin N. Rome, Joshua J. Gagne, Jerry Avorn, Aaron S. Kesselheim

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.