Abbonarsi

An appraisal of the Wilson & Jungner criteria in the context of genomic-based newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity - 04/02/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.633 
Jovanka R. King, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, BMBS(Hons) a, b, c, Luigi D. Notarangelo, PhD, MD d, Lennart Hammarström, PhD, MD a,
a Department of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden 
b Department of Immunopathology, SA Pathology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital Campus, Adelaide, Australia 
c Robinson Research Institute and Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 
d Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md 

Corresponding author: Lennart Hammarström, PhD, MD, Department of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden.Department of Clinical ImmunologyKarolinska University Hospital HuddingeStockholmSE-14186Sweden

Abstract

Wilson and Jungner’s recommendations for population-based screening have been used to guide decisions regarding candidate disease inclusion in newborn screening programs for the past 50 years. The advent of genomic-based technologies, including next-generation sequencing and its potential application to newborn screening, along with a changing landscape in terms of modern clinical practice and ethical, social, and legal considerations has led to a call for review of these criteria. Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are a heterogeneous group of more than 450 genetically determined disorders of immunity, which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly where diagnosis and treatment are delayed. We argue that in addition to screening for severe combined immunodeficiency disease, which has already been initiated in several countries, other clinically significant IEI should be screened for at birth. Because of disease heterogeneity and identifiable genetic targets, a next-generation sequencing–based screening approach would be most suitable. A combination of worldwide experience and technological advances has improved our ability to diagnose and effectively treat patients with IEI. Considering IEI in the context of updated recommendations for population-based screening supports their potential inclusion as disease targets in newborn screening programs.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Inborn errors of immunity, newborn screening, next-generation sequencing, severe combined immunodeficiency

Abbreviations used : ADA, AT, GT, HLH, HSCT, IEI, IEM, JAK, LRBA, MS/MS, mTOR, NGS, SCID, STAT, TREC, WES, VUS, WGS


Mappa


 L.D.N. is supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (grant no. 1 ZIA AI001222-02).
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. Hammarström is on the advisory board of ImmunoIVD. ImmunoIVD manufactures commercial kits for newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity using currently available technologies (T-cell receptor excision circle and kappa-deleting recombination excision circle quantitation). ImmunoIVD does not currently provide commercial assays for newborn screening using next-generation sequencing. In addition, ImmunoIVD does not have any future plans to establish such testing. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
 Terms in boldface and italics are detailed in the glossary on page 429.


© 2020  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 147 - N° 2

P. 428-438 - Febbraio 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • SCID newborn screening: What we’ve learned
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Animal models of psoriasis—highlights and drawbacks
  • Michael P. Schön, Veit Manzke, Luise Erpenbeck

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.