Abbonarsi

The Second Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM-2) study optimizing pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy in older ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients - 16/08/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.029 
Paul W. Armstrong, MD a, Kris Bogaerts, PhD b, Robert Welsh, MD a, Peter R. Sinnaeve, MD, PhD c, Patrick Goldstein, MD d, Alain Pages, MD e, Thierry Danays, MD f, Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD c,

on behalf of the STREAM 2 Study Groups (appendix)

a The Canadian Virtual Coordinating Centre for Global Collaborative Cardiovascular Research {Canadian VIGOUR Centre}, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 
b Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), KU Leuven, Leuven and University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium 
c Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 
d Emergency Department and SAMU, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France 
e Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany 
f TDC, Aix en Provence, France 

Reprint requests: Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD, KU Leuven, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, BelgiumKU Leuven, Department of Cardiovascular SciencesHerestraat 49LeuvenB-3000Belgium

Abstract

Background

The STREAM study demonstrated that a pharmaco-invasive strategy was at least as effective as primary PCI (pPCI) in patients presenting early with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The current trial is a response to the finding that reduced intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients ≥75 years occurred after halving the dose of tenecteplase. Additionally, a subsequent analysis of full dose tenecteplase or alteplase in the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT) trials demonstrated a steep increase in bleeding events beginning around the age of 60 years.

Methods

STREAM-2 will compare the efficacy and safety of a novel pharmaco-invasive strategy as compared to routine pPCI in STEMI patients ≥60 years presenting within 3 hours from symptom onset. In the pharmaco-invasive arm patients will receive half-dose tenecteplase, as soon as possible before transport to a PCI center. In the pPCI arm, patients will be treated according to optimal standard of care defined by local practice. The key criteria for efficacy will be the number of patients achieving ≥50% ST-segment resolution before and after PCI in lead with maximal ST elevation at baseline and the clinical endpoints of death, congestive heart failure, shock or re-infarction, rescue PCI and aborted myocardial infarction, both singularly and as a composite at 30 days. Key safety criteria are total stroke, ICH and major non-intracranial bleeds. Approximately 600 patients will be randomized (400 to pharmaco-invasive treatment and 200 to pPCI). An interim analysis is planned after 300 patients are enrolled to consider adapting the trial to include a larger sample size aimed at undertaking a formal confirmatory trial.

Discussion

The study will provide new insights aimed at establishing an effective and safer pharmaco-invasive treatment for the growing population of older STEMI patients who cannot undergo timely pPCI.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02777580


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 226

P. 140-146 - agosto 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The RICH LIFE Project: A cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of health system only vs. health system Plus a collaborative/stepped care intervention to reduce hypertension disparities
  • Lisa A. Cooper, Jill A. Marsteller, Kathryn A. Carson, Katherine B. Dietz, Romsai T. Boonyasai, Carmen Alvarez, Chidinma A. Ibe, Deidra C. Crews, Hsin-Chieh Yeh, Edgar R. Miller, Cheryl R. Dennison-Himmelfarb, Lisa H. Lubomski, Tanjala S. Purnell, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Nae-Yuh Wang, RICH LIFE Project Investigators
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data
  • Bryan C. Wallace, Larry A. Allen, Christopher E. Knoepke, Russell E. Glasgow, Carmen L. Lewis, Diane L. Fairclough, Laura J. Helmkamp, Monica D. Fitzgerald, Wendy S. Tzou, Daniel B. Kramer, Paul D. Varosy, Sanjaya K. Gupta, John M. Mandrola, Scott C. Brancato, Pamela N. Peterson, Daniel D. Matlock

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.