Abbonarsi

International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches–Chronic Kidney Disease (ISCHEMIA-CKD): Rationale and design - 17/12/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.023 
Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA a, , David J. Maron, MD b, Jerome L. Fleg, MD c, Sean M. O’Brien, MD d, Charles A. Herzog, MD e, Gregg W. Stone, MD f, Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH d, John A. Spertus, MD, MPH g, Karen P. Alexander, MD d, Mandeep S. Sidhu, MD h, Glenn M. Chertow, MD b, William E. Boden, MD i, Judith S. Hochman, MD a

on behalf of the ISCHEMIA-CKD Research Group

a New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 
b Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 
c National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 
d Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 
e Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 
f New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY 
g Mid-America Heart Institute/University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 
h Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 
i Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Informatics Center, Boston, MA 

Reprint requests: Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA, Professor of Medicine, Director, Complex Coronary Intervention, Bellevue, Director of Research, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Director, Cardiovascular Outcomes Group, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.New York University School of MedicineNew YorkNY10016

Riassunto

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stable ischemic heart disease are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events. Prior trials comparing a strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization have largely excluded patients with advanced CKD. Whether a routine invasive approach when compared with a conservative strategy is beneficial in such patients is unknown.

Methods

ISCHEMIA-CKD is a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded randomized trial designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of an initial invasive strategy (cardiac catheterization and optimal revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] plus OMT) versus a conservative strategy (OMT alone, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] reserved for failure of OMT) on long-term clinical outcomes in 777 patients with advanced CKD (defined as those with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis) and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the invasive or a conservative strategy. The primary end point is a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Major secondary endpoints are a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest; angina control; and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes such as initiation of maintenance dialysis and a composite of initiation of maintenance dialysis or death will be reported. The trial is projected to have 80% power to detect a 22% to 24% reduction in the primary composite end point with the invasive strategy when compared with the conservative strategy.

Conclusions

ISCHEMIA-CKD will determine whether an initial invasive management strategy improves clinical outcomes when added to OMT in patients with advanced CKD and stable ischemic heart disease.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Michelle O'Shaughnessy, MD, served as guest editor for this article.
 RCT# NCT01985360.
 Funding source: The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL117904, U01HL117905).
 Disclaimer: The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institutes of Health; or the United States Department of Health and Human Services.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 205

P. 42-52 - Novembre 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Design and rationale of the COAPT trial
  • Michael J. Mack, William T. Abraham, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Steven F. Bolling, Ted E. Feldman, Paul A. Grayburn, Samir R. Kapadia, Patrick M. McCarthy, D. Scott Lim, James E. Udelson, Michael R. Zile, James S. Gammie, A. Marc Gillinov, Donald D. Glower, David A. Heimansohn, Rakesh M. Suri, Jeffrey T. Ellis, Yu Shu, Saibal Kar, Neil J. Weissman, Gregg W. Stone
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Edoxaban Versus standard of care and their effects on clinical outcomes in patients having undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Atrial Fibrillation—Rationale and design of the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF trial
  • Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Martin Unverdorben, Marco Valgimigli, Roxana Mehran, Eric Boersma, Usman Baber, Christian Hengstenberg, Minggao Shi, Cathy Chen, Shigeru Saito, Roland Veltkamp, Pascal Vranckx, George D. Dangas

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.