Abbonarsi

Exploring the attitudes & practices of shared decision-making for CT scan use in emergency department patients with abdominal pain - 24/11/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.029 
Hamza Ijaz, BS a, Christopher Wong, MBS a, Jennifer Weaver, MA, OTR/L b, Trudy Mallinson, PhD, OTR/L b, Lorna Richards, MA a, Maxine A. Le Saux, BS a, Haijun Wang, MS c, Yan Ma, PhD c, Andrew C. Meltzer, MD MS a,
a The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States of America 
b The George Washington University, Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, United States of America 
c The George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: 2120 L Street NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20037, United States of America.2120 L Street NW, Suite 450WashingtonDC20037United States of America

Abstract

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM) has been studied in the emergency department (ED) in relation to hospital admissions but not for CT scan utilization. CT scans are a common imaging modality with high accuracy that emit considerable ionizing radiation. This study has three aims: to measure provider and patient preference for SDM; to evaluate patient involvement in the decision to order a CT scan; and to determine the association between patient involvement and CT utilization.

Methods

In this prospective study, stable ED patients with abdominal pain with CT imaging as a likely diagnostic tool, were screened and consented. The Control Preferences Scale assessed patient and provider baseline decision-making preference. Using the OPTION-5 tool, providers were assessed in each encounter for the extent to which they engaged patients in discussions. The association between the Control Preferences Scale, the OPTION-5 score and ultimate CT utilization was evaluated.

Results

Twenty-nine encounters were observed. CT was considered in 70% (n = 20) of encounters and ordered in 55% (n = 16). 62% of patients and 59% of providers reported that they prefer “shared responsibility” when making treatment decisions. In >80% of encounters, provider's showed no or minimal effort when discussing whether to perform a CT scan. Provider or patient preference was not associated with patient involvement. Patient involvement was not associated with CT utilization.

Conclusions

High rates of provider and patient preference to use SDM for treatment plans were reported but providers were rarely observed engaging patients with abdominal pain in the decision to order a CT scan.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Abdominal pain, CT scan, Shared decision-making, Control Preferences Scale, OPTION-5


Mappa


 This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 36 - N° 12

P. 2263-2267 - Dicembre 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Surfactant for the management of pediatric hydrocarbon ingestion
  • Christopher Sommer, Adam B. Johnson, G. Sam Wang, Kevin Poel
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Hypertensive ED patients: Missed opportunities for addressing hypertension and facilitating outpatient follow-up
  • Walter Tyler Winders, Ren Ariizumi, Kimberly Hart, Nancy Elder, Michael Lyons, Christopher Lindsell, Opeolu Adeoye

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.