Abbonarsi

Feasibility and accuracy of speckle tracking echocardiography in emergency department patients - 24/11/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.074 
Lindsay Reardon a, , 1 , William J. Scheels a, 2 , Adam J. Singer b , Robert F. Reardon a
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, HSC L4-080, 8350 SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8350, United States of America.Department of Emergency MedicineHSC L4-0808350 SUNYStony BrookNY11794-8350United States of America

Abstract

Background

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a novel technology that measures regional wall-motion abnormalities that may speed diagnosis and intervention of acute coronary occlusion in Emergency Department (ED) patients with non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). STE provides an objective measurement of myocardial strain that is superior to visual assessment of wall motion when performed as part of a point-of-care (POC) echocardiogram. We determined the feasibility and preliminary accuracy of POC STE operated by emergency providers when compared to comprehensive echocardiography or final diagnosis of ACS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 187 emergency provider POC echocardiograms with STE from 7/2014–5/2016 for suspected ACS at a large academic trauma center. Feasibility of POC STE was determined by calculating the percentage of complete exams (adequate apical 4-chamber and parasternal short axis views) out of all STE exams. We then used two different criterion standards for calculating diagnostic accuracy of STE: comprehensive echocardiograms with wall motion abnormalities or formal diagnosis of ACS based on elevated cardiac troponins, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery stenosis >70% on catheterization.

Results

Of 187 STE studies performed, 75 (40%) were considered complete. Ultrasound-experienced providers had higher rates of complete exams (65% vs. 35%, P = 0.01). 16 of 75 exams (21%) were positive for myocardial strain, and of these 16 (100%) were admitted, 12 (75%) had positive troponins, 6 (46%) had positive comprehensive echocardiograms, and 3 (19%) had PCI or >70% stenotic lesion on catheterization. Compared with comprehensive echocardiography, POC STE had 35% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 46% positive predictive value (PPV), and 59% negative predictive value (NPV). Compared with formal diagnosis of ACS, POC STE had 29% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 75% positive predictive value (PPV), and 51% negative predictive value (NPV).

Conclusion

STE is a potentially feasible adjunct to standard bedside echocardiography in ED patients with suspected ACS when operated by experienced ultrasound-trained physicians in the ED. This data shows STE performed by emergency providers is not yet sensitive enough alone to diagnose ACS, and has low accuracy when compared to comprehensive echocardiography. However, the PPV and specificity improve when performed by expert ultrasound-trained providers. STE should be considered for inclusion in the Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship curriculum.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Point-of-care ultrasound, Echocardiography, Emergency ultrasound, Speckle tracking echocardiography, Strain echocardiography


Mappa


 Sources of support: There were no funding sources for this study.
☆☆ LR, WJS, AJS and RFR report no conflicts of interest and have no disclosures.
 Presentations: SAEM18, Indianapolis, May 17, 2018.


© 2018  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 36 - N° 12

P. 2254-2259 - Dicembre 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Air pollutants and atmospheric pressure increased risk of ED visit for spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Joo Hyung Park, Sun Hwa Lee, Seong Jong Yun, Seokyong Ryu, Seung Woon Choi, Hye Jin Kim, Tae Kyung Kang, Sung Chan Oh, Suk Jin Cho
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Surfactant for the management of pediatric hydrocarbon ingestion
  • Christopher Sommer, Adam B. Johnson, G. Sam Wang, Kevin Poel

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.