Abbonarsi

Bicruciate-retaining vs. posterior-stabilized TKA: A prospective RCT - 23/11/17

Prothèse totale du genou à préservation des ligaments croisés vs prothèse postéro-stabilisée : étude prospective randomisée

Doi : 10.1016/j.rcot.2017.09.017 
Frédéric Lavoie , Sophie Zhu, Fidaa Al-Shakfa, Pierre Sabouret
 1560, rue Sherbrooke Est, local DR-1106-B Montréal, Canada 

Corresponding author.

Riassunto

Introduction

There has been a resurgence of popularity in performing bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as opposed to the more common posterior-stabilized (PS). BCR may be better for young and active patients since it restores knee kinematics better than other prosthetic designs. However, there is a belief in the community that BCR results in stiffer knees. There is not yet any study that shows clear clinical differences between BCR and PS TKAs. This study aims to clarify this point of contention.

Materials and methods

A prospective randomized control trial was conducted where patients were randomized to have either BCR or PS TKA implanted using a spacer-based gap balancing technique. A total of 32 BCR and 34 PS knees were evaluated (54 patients). Results were obtained at the preoperative visit and the subsequent postoperative visits up to 2 years and above. In this study, knee range of motion measurements, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), as well as Knee Society (KS) knee and function scores were compared between groups and visits.

Résultats

There was a significant difference in maximum knee flexion between BCR and PS patients at 6 weeks (BCRmean 94.8°, PSmean 113.6°, P<0.001), 6 months (BCRmean 109.5°, PSmean 123.2°, P 0.017), and 12 months (BCRmean 113.5°, PSmean 126.1°, P 0.003). No significant difference was found between the two groups at 2 years (BCRmean 120.4°, PSmean 128.0°, P 0.087). Similar results were found when the knees with a preoperative maximum flexion130° were analyzed separately. The KOOS and KS knee and function scores were globally similar at every visit between the groups as neither yielded significant differences, with the exception of the KOOS score at 6 weeks that was higher for PS knees.

Discussion

The results confirm the suspicion that BCR TKA results in stiffer knees than PS TKA during the early postoperative period. However the difference in maximum flexion decreased and tended to resolve by the 2-year postoperative visit. The difference also did not seem to have an impact on the various clinical and functional outcome measurements that were collected after 6weeks.

Conclusion

BCR TKA does not result in stiffer knees than PS TKA after 2years. There appears to be a stiffening phenomenon that occurs after BCR TKA compared to PS TKA but it seems to resolve over time. Further investigation on the causes of this phenomenon is warranted. Further follow-up of this patient cohort will provide additional relevant information.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2017  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 103 - N° 7S

P. S28 - novembre 2017 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Résultats à plus de deux ans des arthroplasties totales du genou ayant nécessité une ostéotomie de l’épicondyle interne pour rééquilibrage ligamentaire
  • Bruno Tillie, François Quandalle, Nicolas Tarissi
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • PTG sur genu valgum : voie d’abord interne ou externe ? Étude rétrospective comparative de 285 cas à plus de 5 ans de recul
  • Guillaume Villatte, Roger Érivan, Émilien Éngels, Aurélien Mulliez, Stéphane Boisgard, Stéphane Descamps

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.