Suscribirse

Choosing Wisely: Adherence by Physicians to Recommended Use of Spirometry in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Asthma - 24/04/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.006 
Kristin C. Sokol, MD, MS, MPH a, , Gulshan Sharma, MD, MPH b, Yu-Li Lin, MS c, Randall M. Goldblum, MD d
a Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 
b Sealy & Smith Distinguished Chair in Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 
c Office of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 
d Child Health Research Center Laboratory, Departments of Pediatrics and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Kristin C. Sokol, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555.

Abstract

Purpose

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) and the American Thoracic Society provide guidelines stating that physicians should use spirometry in the diagnosis and management of asthma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends, over a 10-year period, in the utilization of spirometry in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. We hypothesized that spirometry use would increase in physicians who care for asthma patients, especially since 2007, when the revised NAEPP guidelines were published.

Methods

This retrospective cohort analysis of spirometry use in subjects newly diagnosed with asthma used a privately insured adult population for the years 2002-2011. Our primary outcome of interest was spirometry performed within a year (± 365 days) of the initial date of asthma diagnosis. We also examined the type of asthma medications prescribed.

Results

In all, 134,208 patients were found to have a diagnosis of asthma. Only 47.6% had spirometry performed within 1 year of diagnosis. Younger patients, males, and those residing in the Northeast were more likely to receive spirometry. Spirometry use began to decline in 2007. Patients cared for by specialists were more likely to receive spirometry than those cared for by primary care physicians; 80.1% vs 23.3%, respectively. Lastly, even without spirometry, a significant portion of patients (78.3%) was prescribed asthma drugs.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that spirometry is underutilized in newly diagnosed asthma patients. Moreover, the use of controller medications in those diagnosed with asthma without spirometry remains high.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Asthma, Choosing Wisely, Cost, Pulmonary function test, Spirometry


Esquema


 Funding: Funding was provided by UT Systems Health IT and Systems Engineering.
 Conflict of Interest: GS serves on the advisory board of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.


© 2015  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 128 - N° 5

P. 502-508 - mai 2015 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Sensitive Troponin Assay and the Classification of Myocardial Infarction
  • Anoop S.V. Shah, David A. McAllister, Rosamund Mills, Kuan Ken Lee, Antonia M.D. Churchhouse, Kathryn M. Fleming, Elizabeth Layden, Atul Anand, Omar Fersia, Nikhil V. Joshi, Simon Walker, Allan S. Jaffe, Keith A.A. Fox, David E. Newby, Nicholas L. Mills
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Correlates, Management, and Outcomes in the EORP-AF Pilot General Registry
  • Giuseppe Boriani, Cecile Laroche, Igor Diemberger, Elisa Fantecchi, Mircea Ioachim Popescu, Lars Hvilsted Rasmussen, Gianfranco Sinagra, Lucian Petrescu, Luigi Tavazzi, Aldo P. Maggioni, Gregory Y.H. Lip

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.