Suscribirse

Anaphylaxis: A Payor's Perspective on Epinephrine Autoinjectors - 31/12/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.013 
Jeffrey D. Dunn, PharmD, MBA a, 1, David A. Sclar, BPharm, PhD b,
a SelectHealth, Salt Lake City, Utah 
b Midwestern University, Glendale, Ariz 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to David A. Sclar, BPharm, PhD, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, 19555 N. 59th Ave., Glendale, AZ 85308.

Abstract

The scope of expenditures due to anaphylaxis likely is underestimated by health care payors because anaphylaxis is underdiagnosed and, when reported, most costs of anaphylaxis borne by payors relate to direct medical expenses. Direct costs of anaphylaxis have been estimated at $1.2 billion per year, with direct expenditures of $294 million for epinephrine, and indirect costs of $609 million. More accurate diagnostic coding will allow payors to improve their understanding of the full impact of anaphylaxis on health care plans, employers, patients, and their families. Similarly, more accurate diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis should have a direct effect on overall cost savings achieved in this disease state. This includes savings in both direct costs, such as emergency department visits, and indirect costs, such as lost productivity of patients and caregivers. Educating medical personnel on treatment guidelines regarding the specific use of appropriate epinephrine autoinjectors will contribute to cost savings. Even though the cost of autoinjectors has been increasing, evidence indicates that the cost of improper response to, and treatment of, anaphylaxis outweighs that increase. At this time, there are several branded epinephrine autoinjectors and one generic equivalent for one of these branded products available on the US market; the branded autoinjectors are not considered equivalents for substitution. Barriers to coverage and access, such as managed care organization tier classification, medication copay, and socioeconomic status of specific patients, need to be examined more closely and addressed. Education in the proper use of epinephrine autoinjectors, including regular checking of medication expiration dates, is critical for proper management of anaphylaxis and minimizing the costs of anaphylactic events. Managed care organizations can play a role in educational initiatives.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Allergy, Anaphylaxis, Cost analysis, Epinephrine, Insurance coverage, Managed care, Medical education, Patient education, Quality of health care


Esquema


 Funding: This work was supported by Mylan Specialty L.P.
 Conflict of Interest: Jeffrey D. Dunn, PharmD, MBA, has served as an advisor for Mylan Specialty L.P. and received an honorarium for attending the Partnership for Anaphylaxis Round Table. No payment was received for writing of this manuscript. David A. Sclar, BPharm, PhD, has served as an advisor for Mylan Specialty L.P. (including receipt of an honorarium for attending the Partnership for Anaphylaxis Round Table), 3M, Allergan, Alza, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Axcan, Baxter Bioscience, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Forest Laboratories, Gambro, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Optimer, Pfizer, Teva, and Wyeth. No payment was received for writing of this manuscript.
 Authorship: Drs Dunn and Sclar both fully qualify for authorship of the manuscript, having made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; and the identification and interpretation of the appropriate published literature. Both authors were equally involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content, reviewed the final manuscript, and gave approval for submission. Drs Dunn and Sclar are both accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


© 2014  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 127 - N° 1S

P. S45-S50 - janvier 2014 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Anaphylaxis on the Other Front Line: Perspectives from the Emergency Department
  • Richard M. Nowak, Charles G. Macias

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.