Comparison of phenotypes of childhood wheeze and cough in 2 independent cohorts - 30/10/13
Abstract |
Background |
Among children with wheeze and recurrent cough there is great variation in clinical presentation and time course of the disease. We previously distinguished 5 phenotypes of wheeze and cough in early childhood by applying latent class analysis to longitudinal data from a population-based cohort (original cohort).
Objective |
To validate previously identified phenotypes of childhood cough and wheeze in an independent cohort.
Methods |
We included 903 children reporting wheeze or recurrent cough from an independent population-based cohort (validation cohort). As in the original cohort, we used latent class analysis to identify phenotypes on the basis of symptoms of wheeze and cough at 2 time points (preschool and school age) and objective measurements of atopy, lung function, and airway responsiveness (school age). Prognostic outcomes (wheeze, bronchodilator use, cough apart from colds) 5 years later were compared across phenotypes.
Results |
When using a 5-phenotype model, the analysis distinguished 3 phenotypes of wheeze and 2 of cough as in the original cohort. Two phenotypes were closely similar in both cohorts: Atopic persistent wheeze (persistent multiple trigger wheeze and chronic cough, atopy and reduced lung function, poor prognosis) and transient viral wheeze (early-onset transient wheeze with viral triggers, favorable prognosis). The other phenotypes differed more between cohorts. These differences might be explained by differences in age at measurements.
Conclusions |
Applying the same method to 2 different cohorts, we consistently identified 2 phenotypes of wheeze (atopic persistent wheeze, transient viral wheeze), suggesting that these represent distinct disease processes. Differences found in other phenotypes suggest that the age when features are assessed is critical and should be considered carefully when defining phenotypes.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Key words : Wheeze, cough, asthma, children, phenotypes, latent class analysis, cluster analysis, cohort study, allergy, bronchial responsiveness
Abbreviations used : ALSPAC, BIC, BHR, BLRT, LCA
Esquema
The work presented in this article was funded by Asthma UK (grant no. 07/048) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. PDFMP3-123162 and 32003B-144068). B. D. Spycher is the recipient of a European Respiratory Society/Marie Curie Joint Research Fellowship (MC 1614-2010). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Respiratory Society and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013-Marie Curie Actions under grant agreement RESPIRE, PCOFUND-GA-2008-229571. Data collection has been funded by UK National Asthma Campaign, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (R&D), Leicestershire & Rutland Partnership Trust, Medisearch, Trent NHS Regional Health Authority, and the UK Department of Health. |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. D. Spycher has received grants from Swiss National Science Foundation, and the European Respiratory Society/Marie Curie Actions Joint Research Fellowship. C. S. Beardsmore and M. Silverman have received a grant from Asthma UK. C. E. Keuhni has received a grant from Swiss National Science Foundation. A. M. Pescatore declares no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 132 - N° 5
P. 1058-1067 - novembre 2013 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?