Suscribirse

Predicting Survival in Oldest Old People - 17/11/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.01.034 
Diana G. Taekema, MD, PhD a, b, , J. Gussekloo, MD, PhD c, Rudi G.J. Westendorp, MD, PhD a, d, Anton J.M. de Craen, PhD a, d, Andrea B. Maier, MD, PhD a, d
a Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands 
b Department of Geriatrics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands 
c Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands 
d Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Diana G. Taekema, MD, Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, C2-R-133, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands

Abstract

Objective

Measures of physical performance are regarded as useful objective clinical tools to estimate survival in elderly people. However, oldest old people, aged 85 years or more, are underrepresented in earlier studies and frequently unable to perform functional tests. We studied the association of gait speed and survival in a cohort of oldest old people and the association of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living by questionnaire and survival as an alternative prognostic marker of survival.

Methods

The Leiden 85-plus Study was used, a prospective population-based study with a follow-up period of 12 years. The study comprised 599 participants all aged 85 years at baseline. Survival rate was the measurement.

Results

At age 85 years, 73 participants (12.2%) did not perform the walking test. Gait speed faster than 0.8 m/s was present in only 48 participants (9%), and gait speed faster than 1.0 m/s was present in 10 participants (1.9%). Risk for all-cause mortality was higher in participants with slow gait speed after 2 and 12 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-4.75; P<.001; and HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.61-2.59; P=.100, respectively). Significance was lost after adjustment for common confounders. Poor Instrumental Activities of Daily Living ability was associated with an increased risk of mortality after 2 and 12 years of follow-up (HR, 6.11; 95% CI, 3.44-10.87; P<.001; and HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.22-3.40; P<.001, respectively). Adjustment for possible confounders attenuated the relation but remained significant.

Conclusions

The cutoff points for gait speed in oldest old people need to be reevaluated. In oldest old people aged 85 years, slow gait speed (≤0.40 m/s in women and ≤0.45 m/s in men) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living disability are both predictors of survival. Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living could be a better tool for short- and long-term prognostication of survival in oldest old people.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Disability, Epidemiology, Gait speed, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Oldest old people, Survival


Esquema


 Funding: The work was supported by the Program Translational Research of the Netherlands organization for health research and development, the Leiden University Fund, and an unrestricted grant from the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (ZonMw), the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports, the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for scientific research (05040202 and 050-060-810 Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging), and the seventh framework program MYOAGE (HEALTH-2007-2.4.5-10).
 Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.
 Michael W. Rich, MD, Section Editor


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 125 - N° 12

P. 1188 - décembre 2012 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Tailoring Colorectal Cancer Screening by Considering Risk of Advanced Proximal Neoplasia
  • Thomas F. Imperiale, Elizabeth A. Glowinski, Ching Lin-Cooper, David F. Ransohoff
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Preoperative Statin Use and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury
  • Steven M. Brunelli, Sushrut S. Waikar, Brian T. Bateman, Tara I. Chang, Joyce Lii, Amit X. Garg, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Niteesh K. Choudhry

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.