Suscribirse

Insulin Order Sets Improve Glycemic Control and Processes of Care - 30/08/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.02.018 
Catherine H.Y. Yu, MD, MHSc a, b, c, , Xing Hua Sun, BSc d, Rosane Nisenbaum, PhD e, f, Henry Halapy, PharmD d
a Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
b Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
c Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
d St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
e Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
f Applied Health Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Catherine H. Y. Yu, MD, MHSc, St Michael's Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, Toronto ON M5C 2T2

Abstract

Objective

The study objective was to evaluate the impact of a standardized preprinted subcutaneous correctional insulin order set on glycemic control, processes of care, and nursing satisfaction.

Methods

This was a controlled before/after, qualitative study using focus group interviews. The intervention group consisted of patients with diabetes who were admitted to the cardiovascular surgery ward. The control group consisted of patients with diabetes who were admitted to the vascular surgery ward. Registered nurses on the cardiovascular surgery floor participated in focus groups and completed surveys. We used a multifaceted intervention including standardized insulin order sheet, educational workshops, verbal and printed reminders, printed enabler, reference sheet, and overnight helpline. Glycemic control and hypoglycemia were assessed through chart review, and nursing satisfaction with the insulin order sets was assessed through surveys and nursing focus groups, performed before and 6 months after implementation of the insulin order set.

Results

There was a 39% reduction in proportion of blood glucose>11.0 mmol/L (198 mg/dL) in the intervention group compared with the control group (0.17 vs 0.28, P=.03). The proportion of hypoglycemia (blood glucose<4.0 mmol/L [72 mg/dL]) was no different between the 2 groups. Nurse satisfaction increased significantly (P<.02); order sets were easy to use and improved glycemic control, processes, and efficiency of care, and reduced the number of pages between nursing and medical staff.

Conclusions

Standardized insulin order sets reduced hyperglycemia and improved nursing satisfaction and processes of care. Successful implementation required stakeholder engagement, identification of barriers and facilitators in local practice, and tailoring the intervention to target these factors.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Attitude of health personnel, Diabetes mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Inpatients, Insulin, Interprofessional relations, Order sets


Esquema


 Funding: The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care provided support to R. Nisenbaum. The views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. This study was partially supported by an unrestricted project grant from NovoNordisk Canada, Inc. They provided no input into the design of the study, data collection, data analysis, or write-up.
 Conflict of Interest: C. Yu has received an honorarium from Shoppers Drug Mart. H. Halapy is on an Advisory Board for Eli Lilly and has received an honorarium from Shoppers Drug Mart. K. Sun and R. Nisenbaum have no conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 125 - N° 9

P. 922 - septembre 2012 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Telephone Follow-up as a Primary Care Intervention for Postdischarge Outcomes Improvement: A Systematic Review
  • J. Benjamin Crocker, Jonathan T. Crocker, Jeffrey L. Greenwald
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Interventions to Increase Osteoporosis Treatment in Patients with ‘Incidentally’ Detected Vertebral Fractures
  • Sumit R. Majumdar, Finlay A. McAlister, Jeffrey A. Johnson, Debbie Bellerose, Kerry Siminoski, David A. Hanley, Ibrahim Qazi, Douglas A. Lier, Robert G. Lambert, Anthony S. Russell, Brian H. Rowe

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.