Suscribirse

Repeat Abdominal Imaging Examinations in a Tertiary Care Hospital - 23/01/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.031 
Ivan K. Ip, MD, MPH a, b, , Koenraad J. Mortele, MD a, c, Luciano M. Prevedello, MD a, Ramin Khorasani, MD, MPH a, c
a Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
b Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 
c Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Ivan K. Ip, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 20 Kent Street, 2nd floor, Boston, MA 02120

Abstract

Background

Reducing unnecessary repeat imaging may reduce waste and costs, and improve health care quality. We aimed to quantify repeat imaging rates in patients with abdominal imaging examinations, and identify factors associated with repeat imaging.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all diagnostic abdominal computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), fluoroscopy, and radiograph reports performed at our institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009. Primary outcome measure was the rate of repeat abdominal imaging (RAI) examinations, defined as any imaging examination of the abdomen on the same patient within 0-90 days of the first (enrollment) examination. We used natural language processing tools to extract recommendations for follow-up imaging from radiology reports. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were fitted to determine the effect of patient age, sex, study modality, care setting, follow-up recommendations, and history of neoplasm on the primary outcome over time.

Results

Over 10 years, 245,184 abdominal imaging examinations were performed (43.2% CT, 20.6% US, 16.6% radiograph, 13.9% fluoroscopy, 5.7% MRI). The RAI rate remained unchanged (41.2% to 41.7%); unadjusted RAI volume increased from 6596 to 12,218 (P <.01). Most repeat studies (88.2%) were not preceded by a radiologist's recommendation. Practice setting, study modality, patient age, sex, underlying health condition, and radiologist's recommendations were associated with higher rate of repeat abdominal imaging examinations.

Conclusions

A large proportion of abdominal imaging examinations result in a repeat study. Many factors contribute to repeat imaging, including patient age, sex, underlying disease, initial study modality, practice setting, and radiologist's recommendation.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Health policy, Imaging utilization, Repeat imaging


Esquema


 Robert G. Stern, MD, Section Editor
 Funding: This study was funded in part by Grant 1UC4EB012952-01 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
 Conflict of Interest: None.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 125 - N° 2

P. 155-161 - février 2012 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Transient Ischemic Attacks in a 22-Year-Old
  • R. Kevin Rogers, Rahul Sakhuja, Ronan Margey, John H. Stone, Kenneth Rosenfield, Michael R. Jaff
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Race/Ethnicity, Sleep Duration, and Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey
  • Ferdinand Zizi, Abhishek Pandey, Renee Murrray-Bachmann, Miriam Vincent, Samy McFarlane, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Girardin Jean-Louis

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.