Suscribirse

A randomized comparison of fluconazole with amphotericin B as empiric anti-fungal agents in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia - 09/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00326-X 
Imtiaz A Malik, MD a, ⁎, Imran Moid, MBBS a, Zeba Aziz, MD b, Shireen Khan, MBBS c, Mohammad Suleman, MBBS c
a Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Karachi, Pakistan (IAM, IM) 
b Department of Oncology, Shaikh Zaid Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan (ZA) 
c Pfizer Laboratories Limited, Karachi (SK, MS), Pakistan 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to Imtiaz A. Malik, MD, National Cancer Institute, 28-C, Tauheed Commercial Area, 26 Street, DHA-5, Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several studies have documented the efficacy of amphotericin B as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia. Amphotericin, however, is a toxic drug. Fluconazole has broad-spectrum antifungal activity with an excellent safety profile. Although prophylactic use of fluconazole is widespread, its efficacy as an empiric antifungal agent has not been extensively investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 106 patients with absolute neutropenia (≤500 cells μL) and persistent fever of undetermined origin (>38°C) despite 1 week of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy to receive either fluconazole 400 mg orally daily or amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day. Patients with obvious invasive fungal infections were excluded, as were those with abnormal renal or hepatic function. Success was defined as defervescence with the initially assigned antifungal regimen without development of clinically evident invasive fungal infection.

RESULTS: Six patients were excluded from the analysis, mostly because they did not have severe neutropenia. Forty-eight patients received amphotericin B, and 52 received fluconazole. Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters as well as duration of neutropenia (7.7 versus 6.9 days), duration of fever (7.8 versus 8.1 days), and duration of hospitalization (10.4 versus 8.3 days) were similar between those receiving amphotericin and fluconazole. Treatment success rates and mortality rates were similar in the two groups: 22 (46%) patients in the amphotericin group and 29 (56%) patients in the fluconazole group responded successfully to therapy (P = 0.3), whereas 16 (33%) patients in the amphotericin group and 14 (27%) patients in the fluconazole group died during hospitalization (P = 0.5). Adverse events such as chills and fever (4 versus 1), bronchospasm (2 versus none), severe hypokalemia (25 versus 12) and nephrotoxicity (9 versus 3) were more frequently observed in patients receiving amphotericin. Adverse prognostic factors included prolonged duration of neutropenia and pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fluconazole is an equally effective but less toxic alternative to amphotericin B as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 1998  Excerpta Medica Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 105 - N° 6

P. 478-483 - décembre 1998 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Incidence and predictors of major hemorrhagic complications from thrombolytic therapy in patients with massive pulmonary embolism
  • Guy Meyer, Mathilde Gisselbrecht, Jean-Luc Diehl, Didier Journois, Hervé Sors
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Clinical and immunological study of 7 patients with minocycline-induced autoimmune phenomena
  • Ori Elkayam, David Levartovsky, Chaim Brautbar, Michael Yaron, Michael Burke, Nurit Vardinon, Dan Caspi

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.