Suscribirse

A new synthetic porcine secretin for facilitation of cannulation of the dorsal pancreatic duct at ERCP in patients with pancreas divisum: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study - 31/08/11

Doi : 10.1067/mge.2003.195 
Benedict M. Devereaux, MB, BS, Seymour Fein, MD, Edward Purich, PhD, J.Richard Trout, PhD, Glen A. Lehman, MD, Evan L. Fogel, MD, Susan Phillips, RN, Robert Etemad, MD, Paul Jowell, MD, Phillip P. Toskes, MD, Stuart Sherman, MD
Indianapolis, Indiana, Silver Spring, Maryland, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Charleston, South Carolina, Durham, North Carolina, and Gainesville, Florida 
Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, ChiRhoClin, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Digestive Diseases Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 

Abstract

Background: Secretin, a 27 amino acid polypeptide released in response to duodenal luminal acidification, stimulates secretion of water and bicarbonate from pancreatic ductal cells. To date the only secretin available for clinical use has been a biologically derived compound extracted from porcine duodenums. Although used to facilitate pancreatic duct cannulation, secretin has not been approved for this indication. In this study, a new synthetic porcine secretin with an identical amino acid composition was compared with saline solution for the facilitation of minor papilla cannulation in patients with pancreas divisum. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative trial was conducted at 4 centers with expertise in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy. Patients with pancreas divisum in whom minor papilla cannulation initially was unsuccessful were enrolled. Either saline solution (placebo) or synthetic porcine secretin was administered. If the minor papilla orifice and/or pancreatic juice flow was noted, cannulation was attempted and success or failure was documented (phase 1), as well as the time taken for successful cannulation. If cannulation was unsuccessful, no juice flow was noted, or the orifice was not seen, the alternate agent was administered (phase 2). Results: Twenty-nine patients (7 men, 22 women; mean age 51 years, range 21-76 years) were enrolled. In phase 1, cannulation was achieved in 1 of 13 patients (7.7%) after the placebo was given and in 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) after synthetic porcine secretin was given (p < 0.0001). In phase 2, cannulation was achieved in 12 of 12 patients (100%) after synthetic porcine secretin was given and in 0 of 3 patients (0%) after the placebo was given (p = 0.0022). Overall, cannulation was successful in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%) who received synthetic porcine secretin and in 1 of 16 (6.3%) who received the placebo (p < 0.0001). Mean time to cannulation was significantly greater for the placebo than for the synthetic porcine secretin (4.75 min vs. 2.63 min; p = 0.0001). No adverse events directly attributable to synthetic porcine secretin administration were documented. Conclusions: This study confirmed the use and safety of synthetic porcine secretin in facilitating cannulation of the minor papilla in patients with pancreas divisum in whom cannulation was difficult. Use of this agent has the potential to further increase the cannulation success rate in this group of patients. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:643-7.)

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Reprint requests: Stuart Sherman, MD, Indiana University Medical Center, 550 N. University Blvd., UH 2300, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
 0016-5107/2003/$30.00 + 0


© 2003  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 57 - N° 6

P. 643-647 - mai 2003 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Endoscope repair by original equipment manufacturers and independent service organizationsJanuary 2003
  • Gregory G. Ginsberg, Alan N. Barkun, John J. Bosco, J.Steven Burdick, Gerard A. Isenberg, Naomi L. Nakao, Bret T. Petersen, William B. Silverman, Adam Slivka, Peter B. Kelsey, ASGE Technology Assessment Committee
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Clinical utility of intraductal US for evaluation of choledocholithiasis
  • Andrew Catanzaro, Patrick Pfau, Gerard A. Isenberg, Richard C.K. Wong, Michael V. Sivak, Amitabh Chak

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.