Suscribirse

Attitudes of physicians toward objective measures of airway function in asthma - 28/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00007-X 
Liza C O’Dowd, MD a, b, Daniel Fife, MD b, c, Thomas Tenhave, MPH, PhD b, Reynold A Panettieri, MD a,
a Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division (LO, RP), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
b Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (LO, DF, TT), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
c Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development (DF), Department of Drug Safety and Surveillance, Titusville, New Jersey, USA 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to Reynold A. Panettieri, Jr, MD, Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 421 Curie Boulevard, 805 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6160, USA

Abstract

Background

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) recommends pulmonary function testing as part of asthma evaluation. The objectives of this study were to determine the use of spirometry in patients with asthma by primary care physicians and asthma specialists, and to identify barriers to use of spirometry.

Methods

We developed, validated, and administered a mailed survey to primary care physicians and asthma specialists in the general community. We asked about the use of spirometry, access to spirometry, and barriers to spirometry use.

Results

Of 975 eligible subjects, 672 (69%) completed the survey. Asthma specialists were more likely to have an office spirometer (78% [216/277] vs. 43% [169/395], P <0.001) than were primary care physicians, and more likely to report measuring pulmonary function in at least 75% of their patients with asthma (83% [223/270] vs. 34% [131/388], P <0.001). In logistic regression analysis, factors most strongly associated with reported spirometry use (in at least 75% of patients) among asthma specialists were owning a spirometer, disagreeing with the statement that the test requires excessive use of office resources, and agreeing that spirometry is a necessary part of the asthma evaluation. Among primary care physicians, owning a spirometer, agreeing that the data are necessary for accurate diagnosis, and believing that they were trained to perform and interpret the test were most strongly associated with reported spirometry use.

Conclusion

Pulmonary function testing is underutilized by physicians, with rates of utilization lowest among primary care physicians. Providing primary care physicians with better access to spirometry, through provision of a machine and appropriate training in its use and interpretation, may improve compliance with the NAEPP recommendations.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Asthma specialists, primary care physicians, practice guidelines, spirometry, asthma


Esquema


 This project was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (5T32HL07586), Bethesda, Maryland, and Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware.


© 2003  Excerpta Medica Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 114 - N° 5

P. 391-396 - avril 2003 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • The effects of a targeted multicomponent delirium intervention on postdischarge outcomes for hospitalized older adults
  • Sidney T Bogardus, Mayur M Desai, Christianna S Williams, Linda Leo-Summers, Denise Acampora, Sharon K Inouye
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care
  • Samuel J. Wang, Blackford Middleton, Lisa A. Prosser, Christiana G. Bardon, Cynthia D. Spurr, Patricia J. Carchidi, Anne F. Kittler, Robert C. Goldszer, David G. Fairchild, Andrew J. Sussman, Gilad J. Kuperman, David W. Bates

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.