Suscribirse

Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients - 25/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01892-9 
Gurpal S. Sandha, MB, BS, FRCPC, Michael J. Bourke, MD, FRACP, Gregory B. Haber, MD, FRCPC , Paul P. Kortan, MD, FRCPC
Current affiliations: University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 

Reprint requests: Gregory B. Haber, MD, FRCP(C), Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 East 77th St., New York, NY 10021.

Toronto, CanadaEditorial p. 590

Abstract

Background

Bile leak is among the most common complications of cholecystectomy. Endoscopic therapy is empiric; a systematic approach to management of bile leak has not been established.

Methods

The severity of bile leak was classified by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography into low grade (leak identified only after intrahepatic opacification) or high grade (leak observed before intrahepatic opacification). Therapy was based on this distinction: biliary sphincterotomy alone for low-grade leaks and stent placement for high-grade leaks. The success of this strategy in consecutive patients treated between 1989 and 1999 was reviewed.

Results

A total of 207 patients (127 women, 80 men; median age 57 years) with bile leak were referred for endoscopic management; 134 had undergone laparoscopic, and 72 had open cholecystectomy. Patients presented at a median of 9 days (range 1-50 days) after surgery. Symptoms included pain (56%), jaundice (16%), fever (11%), and abdominal distension (7%). Persistent percutaneous drainage was present in 48%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography identified the leak site in 204 patients: cystic duct stump, 159 patients (78%); duct of Luschka, 26 (13%); other, 19 (9%). Of 104 patients with low-grade leaks, 75 had sphincterotomy alone; improvement occurred in 68 patients (91%). Subsequent treatment was required in 7 patients (6 stent, 1 surgery). Stents were placed in the remaining 29/104 patients for the following reasons: biliary stricture (11/29); coagulopathy, precluding sphincterotomy (8/29); severe sepsis (3/29); inadequate drainage after prior sphincterotomy (2/29); and unclear reasons (5/29). Of 100 patients with high-grade leaks, 97 had stent placement. Persistent leakage necessitated another stent insertion in 4 patients. Closure of the leak was documented by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in all 97 patients. Three patients with leaks not amenable to endoscopic treatment were referred for surgery. Bile-duct stones were identified in 41 patients (28, low-grade group; 13, high-grade group) and were extracted in all cases. Overall, complications occurred in 3 patients (2 pancreatitis, 1 perforation) and were managed conservatively with no mortality.

Conclusions

A simple, practical endoscopic classification system for bile leak after cholecystectomy is proposed. This classification has clinical relevance for selection of optimal endoscopic management.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 This was presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 20-24, 2000, San Diego, California.


© 2004  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 60 - N° 4

P. 567-574 - octobre 2004 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Endoscopic treatment of retained bile-duct stones by using a balloon catheter for electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy
  • Jong Ho Moon, Sang Woo Cha, Chang Beom Ryu, Young Seok Kim, Su Jin Hong, Young Koog Cheon, Young Deok Cho, Yun Soo Kim, Joon Seong Lee, Moon Sung Lee, Chan Sup Shim, Boo Sung Kim
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Knowledge of indications for EUS among gastroenterologists and non-gastroenterologists
  • Tony E. Yusuf, Gavin C. Harewood, Jonathan E. Clain, Michael J. Levy, Kenneth K. Wang, Mark D. Topazian, Elizabeth Rajan

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.