Suscribirse

Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial - 24/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.025 
Franco Radaelli, MD , Silvia Paggi, MD, Arnaldo Amato, MD, Vittorio Terruzzi, MD
 Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy 

Reprint requests: Franco Radaelli, MD, Divisione di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Valduce, Via Dante 11, 22100 Como, Italy

Resumen

Background

Uncontrolled data suggest that warm water infusion (WWI) instead of air insufflation (AI) during the insertion phase of unsedated colonoscopy improves patient tolerance and satisfaction.

Objective

We tested the hypothesis that water could increase the proportion of patients able to complete unsedated colonoscopy and improve patient tolerance compared with the conventional procedure.

Design

Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting

Single center, community hospital.

Patients

Consecutive outpatients agreeing to start colonoscopy without premedication.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to either WWI or AI insertion phase of colonoscopy. Sedation and/or analgesia were administered on patient request if significant pain or discomfort occurred.

Main Outcome Measurements

Percentage of patients requiring sedation/analgesia. Pain and tolerance scores were assessed at discharge by using a 100-mm visual analog scale.

Results

A total of 230 subjects (116 in the WWI group and 114 in the AI group) were enrolled. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that the proportion of patients requesting sedation/analgesia during the procedure (main outcome measurement) was 12.9% in the WWI group and 21.9% in AI group (P = .07). Cecal intubation rates were 94% in the WWI group and 95.6% in the AI group (P = .57). Median (interquartile range) scores for pain were 28 (12-44) and 39 (14-54) in WWI and AI groups, respectively (P = .05); corresponding figures for tolerance were 10 (3-18) and 14 (5-42), respectively (P = .01). The adenoma detection rates were 25% and 40.1% for the WWI and AI groups, respectively (P = .013).

Limitations

Single-center study, endoscopists not blinded to randomization.

Conclusions

WWI instead of AI is not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients requiring on-demand sedation, although it significantly improves the overall patient tolerance of colonoscopy. The finding of a lower adenoma detection rate in the WWI group calls for further evaluations. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00905554).

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : AI, IQR, WWI


Esquema


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr. Radaelli at francoradaelli@virgilio.it.


© 2010  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 72 - N° 4

P. 701-709 - octobre 2010 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method
  • Felix W. Leung, Judith O. Harker, Guy Jackson, Kate E. Okamoto, Omid M. Behbahani, Nora J. Jamgotchian, H. Steven Aharonian, Paul H. Guth, Surinder K. Mann, Joseph W. Leung
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Unsedated colonoscopy: just add water?
  • David H. Robbins

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.