Suscribirse

Influence of dog ownership and high endotoxin on wheezing and atopy during infancy - 20/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.08.008 
Paloma Campo, MD a, , Harpinder K. Kalra, MD a, , Linda Levin, PhD b, Tiina Reponen, PhD b, Rolanda Olds, BS a, Zana L. Lummus, PhD a, Seung-Hyun Cho, PhD b, Gurjit K. Khurana Hershey, MD, PhD c, James Lockey, MD b, Manuel Villareal, MD a, Sherry Stanforth, CNP a, Grace LeMasters, PhD b, David I. Bernstein, MD a,
a Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology Division 
b Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati 
c Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children’s Hospital Medical Center 

Reprint requests: David I. Bernstein, MD, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670563, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0563.

Cincinnati, Ohio

Abstract

Background

Increased exposure to microbial products early in life may protect from development of atopic disorders in childhood. Few studies have examined the relationship of endotoxin exposure and pet ownership on atopy and wheezing during infancy.

Objective

Evaluate relationships among high endotoxin exposure, pet ownership, atopy, and wheezing in high-risk infants.

Methods

Infants (n = 532; mean age, 12.5 ± 0.8 months) with at least 1 parent with confirmed atopy were recruited. A complete medical history and skin prick testing to foods and aeroallergens were performed at age 1 year. House dust samples were analyzed for endotoxin.

Results

Prevalences of wheezing were not independently associated with dog or cat ownership or endotoxin levels. Percutaneous reactivity to at least 1 allergen was observed in 28.6% of infants. Univariate analyses showed significant associations of any wheezing, recurrent wheezing, and recurrent wheezing with an event with daycare attendance, number of siblings, respiratory infections, maternal smoking, and history of parental asthma. Logistic regression adjusting for the latter variables showed that recurrent wheezing (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9) as well as 2 other wheeze outcomes were significantly reduced in homes with high endotoxin exposure in the presence of 2 or more dogs.

Conclusion

Pet ownership or endotoxin did not independently modify aeroallergen sensitization or wheezing during infancy. However, high endotoxin exposure in the presence of multiple dogs was associated with reduced wheezing in infants.

Clinical implications

A home environment with many dogs and high levels of endotoxin may be conducive to reduced wheezing in infancy.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Key words : Endotoxin, birth cohort, wheeze, house dust, pet ownership

Abbreviations used : CV %, EU, GM, OR, SPT


Esquema


 Supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant NIEHS 1-RO1-ES11170-04 and a Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS)/Fulbright Scholarship awarded to Paloma Campo.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.


© 2006  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 118 - N° 6

P. 1271-1278 - décembre 2006 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Endotoxin exposure, wheezing, and rash in infancy in a New Zealand birth cohort
  • Julie Gillespie, Kristin Wickens, Rob Siebers, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Ian Town, Michael Epton, Penny Fitzharris, David Fishwick, Julian Crane
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Adult obesity, farm childhood, and their effect on allergic sensitization
  • Katja Radon, Anja Schulze

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.