Notification of Abnormal Lab Test Results in an Electronic Medical Record: Do Any Safety Concerns Remain? - 19/08/11
, Eric J. Thomas, MD, MPH b, Dean F. Sittig, PhD c, Lindsey Wilson, MA a, Donna Espadas, BS a, Myrna M. Khan, PhD, MBA a, Laura A. Petersen, MD, MPH aAbstract |
Background |
Follow-up of abnormal outpatient laboratory test results is a major patient safety concern. Electronic medical records can potentially address this concern through automated notification. We examined whether automated notifications of abnormal laboratory results (alerts) in an integrated electronic medical record resulted in timely follow-up actions.
Methods |
We studied 4 alerts: hemoglobin A1c ≥15%, positive hepatitis C antibody, prostate-specific antigen ≥15 ng/mL, and thyroid-stimulating hormone ≥15 mIU/L. An alert tracking system determined whether the alert was acknowledged (ie, provider clicked on and opened the message) within 2 weeks of transmission; acknowledged alerts were considered read. Within 30 days of result transmission, record review and provider contact determined follow-up actions (eg, patient contact, treatment). Multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors for lack of timely follow-up.
Results |
Between May and December 2008, 78,158 tests (hemoglobin A1c, hepatitis C antibody, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and prostate-specific antigen) were performed, of which 1163 (1.48%) were transmitted as alerts; 10.2% of these (119/1163) were unacknowledged. Timely follow-up was lacking in 79 (6.8%), and was statistically not different for acknowledged and unacknowledged alerts (6.4% vs 10.1%; P =.13). Of 1163 alerts, 202 (17.4%) arose from unnecessarily ordered (redundant) tests. Alerts for a new versus known diagnosis were more likely to lack timely follow-up (odds ratio 7.35; 95% confidence interval, 4.16-12.97), whereas alerts related to redundant tests were less likely to lack timely follow-up (odds ratio 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.84).
Conclusions |
Safety concerns related to timely patient follow-up remain despite automated notification of non-life-threatening abnormal laboratory results in the outpatient setting.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Abnormal diagnostic test results, Communication, Diagnostic errors, Electronic medical records, Health information technology, Patient follow-up, Patient safety, Primary care
Esquema
| Funding: The study was supported by an NIH K23 career development award (K23CA125585) to Dr. Singh, the VA National Center of Patient Safety, Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Health Services Research Demonstration and Dissemination Grant (R18 HS17244-02) to Dr. Thomas, and in part by the Houston VA Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence (HFP90-020). These sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. |
|
| The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. |
Vol 123 - N° 3
P. 238-244 - mars 2010 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
