Suscribirse

A comparison of sentinel node biopsy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: timing is important - 18/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.004 
Julie L. Jones, M.D. a, , Katherina Zabicki, M.D. a, b, Roger L. Christian, M.D. b, Michele A. Gadd, M.D. a, Kevin S. Hughes, M.D. a, Beth A. Lesnikoski, M.D. b, Esther Rhei, M.D. b, Michelle C. Specht, M.D. a, Francisco J. Dominguez, M.D. a, Barbara L. Smith, M.D., Ph.D. a
a Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey Building, 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA 
b Department of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-724-4800; fax: +1-617-724-1079.

Abstract

Background

Because neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being used more frequently, the optimal timing of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) remains controversial. We previously evaluated the predictive value of SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Our identification rate of the sentinel node among 52 patients before chemotherapy with a mean tumor size of 4 cm was 100%. In this study, we compared the identification rates of SNB before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated the false-negative rate of SNB after chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective institutional database review identified 36 women who underwent SNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer from 1999 to 2004. The initial clinical tumor size and lymph node status, SNB pathology, axillary lymph node dissection pathology, and residual pathologic tumor size were reviewed.

Results

Sixteen of 36 patients had a clinically negative axilla before neoadjuvant therapy. SNB after neoadjuvant therapy was successful in 29 patients (80.6%), although 7 patients did not map (19.4%). Six of the 7 patients who failed to map had a clinically positive axilla initially. Axillary disease was found in 6 of 7 of these patients at dissection (85.7%). Of the 29 patients who mapped successfully, 13 (45%) were SNB negative, and 16 (55%) were SNB positive. Of the 13 SNB-negative patients, 2 had a positive axillary lymph node dissection, yielding a false-negative rate of 11%. Thirteen patients who mapped had a clinically positive axilla before therapy (45%). Of the 11 patients with true-negative SNBs, 7 (64%) were clinically node negative at presentation. The initial tumor sizes on examination ranged from 2 to 9 cm (mean, 5.0 cm), and residual pathologic tumor sizes ranged from 0 to 6 cm (mean, 1.8 cm). Failure to map correlated with a clinically positive axilla at presentation (100% vs 45%) but did not correlate with initial tumor size.

Conclusions

Sentinel node identification rates are significantly better when mapping is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (100% vs 80.6%), with failure to map correlated with clinically positive nodal disease at presentation and residual disease at axillary lymph node dissection. Among patients who map successfully after chemotherapy, the false-negative rate is high (11%). Given these findings, we currently recommend SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically node-negative patients, and raise concerns about the use of SNB after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with an initially clinically positive axilla.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Breast cancer, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy


Esquema


© 2005  Excerpta Medica Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 190 - N° 4

P. 517-520 - octobre 2005 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Surgery: our challenges, our future
  • Lorraine Tafra
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Local control in ductal carcinoma in situ treated by excision alone: incremental benefit of larger margins
  • Heather R. MacDonald, Melvin J. Silverstein, Helen Mabry, Brenda Moorthy, Wei Ye, Melinda S. Epstein, Dennis Holmes, Howard Silberman, Michael Lagios

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.