The advent of advanced brain imaging techniques has significantly enhanced the understanding and treatment of focal epilepsies, with identifiable brain lesions present in 80 % of cases. Despite this, surgical outcomes remain varied, often influenced by lesion type and location. Traditional lesion-centric approaches may overlook the complex organization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), which often extends beyond the visible lesion, emphasizing the need for comprehensive presurgical evaluations like stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in some cases. This article delves into the concept of epileptogenic networks, moving beyond the notion of a lesional epileptic focus. Through SEEG, three primary network types have been identified: the Epileptogenic Zone Network (EZN), characterized by regions with heightened epileptogenicity and seizure initiation; the Propagation Zone Network (PZN), involving regions with delayed and less intense epileptic activity; and Non-Involved networks (NI). Quantitative measures, such as the epileptogenicity index (EI), aid in delineating these networks, revealing that EZN can be focal or networked, with the latter being more prevalent.

The relationship between epilepsy-associated lesions and network organization is complex. Intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, like focal cortical dysplasia and periventricular nodular heterotopias, often generate epileptiform activities but may still involve broader epileptogenic networks. Non-intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, such as cavernomas and post-stroke lesions, typically lack inherent neuronal activity but can facilitate the development of extensive epileptogenic networks.

Understanding the intricacies of these networks is crucial for optimizing surgical interventions. Recognizing that lesions may represent just one node within a broader epileptogenic network underscores the importance of comprehensive SEEG evaluations to achieve better surgical outcomes.