Suscribirse

Should trochanteric fractures in elderly patients be treated by arthroplasty or internal fixation? - 25/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103778 
François Steffann a, , Brice Rubens-Duval b, Denis Huten c
a Clinique des Cèdres, 5, rue des Tropiques, Parc sud Galaxie, 38130 Échirolles, France 
b Service de chirurgie de l’arthrose et du sport, urgences traumatiques des membres, hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble-Alpes, avenue de Kimberley, 38130 Échirolles, France 
c Service de chirurgie orthopédique et réparatrice, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue H.-Le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Most trochanteric fractures are treated by fixation, most often intramedullary. Nevertheless, the desire to have patients walk as soon as possible and the fear of fixation failure has driven some surgeons to carry out an arthroplasty instead, especially for unstable fractures and/or in patients with severe osteoporosis, in order to avoid the difficult conversion to arthroplasty later on if the fixation fails. The aim of this review was to specify the role, technique and results of performing arthroplasty in this context. In which fractures? Unstable fractures (A2.2, A2.3 and A3), especially in osteoporotic bone, which are the most difficult to reduce and fix, and in cases with associated osteoarthritis. For which patients? Arthroplasty should not be done in patients who have ASA3 due to greater blood loss and longer operative time. Since the postoperative Parker score often drops, arthroplasty should not be done in patients having a Parker score<6. What are the technical problems? Arthroplasty must be done by an experienced surgeon because of the lack of anatomical landmarks, although fracture fixation has its own demands (satisfactory reduction, appropriate length and position of cervicocephalic screw). What are the results and complications? Despite several comparative studies (randomized trials, meta-analysis and prospective studies), it is difficult to draw any conclusions. These studies show worse performance of dynamic hip screws relative to intramedullary nails. The complication and revision rates were higher for nails than arthroplasty, but not in every study, while the functional outcomes with nails (with or without immediate weightbearing) were better than those of arthroplasty beyond 6 months. What is the mortality rate? It was lower after nailing in a few studies but was mainly determined by the patient's comorbidities and preoperative Parker score. The best indication for arthroplasty may be self-sufficient patients over 70 years of age who have an unstable fracture with severe osteoporosis. Nevertheless, new studies should be done to compare arthroplasty to nailing with immediate return to weightbearing in patients having the same type of fracture, defined using 3D CT scan. Level of evidence: Expert advice

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Trochanteric fractures, Arthroplasty, Internal fixation, Extramedullary fixation, Intramedullary fixation


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 110 - N° 1S

Artículo 103778- février 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Distal humerus fracture in older patients: ORIF vs. total elbow arthroplasty
  • François Loisel, Yassine Amar, Severin Rochet, Laurent Obert
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • The upper limb in children with cerebral palsy. Evaluation and treatment
  • Frank Fitoussi, Pauline Lallemant-Dudek

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.