Suscribirse

Prospective observational analysis of intraoperative radiation exposure with a mini C-arm intensifier in percutaneous forefoot surgery - 29/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103705 
Tristan Duguay a, , Victor Housset b, Pierre Alban Bouché c, Alexandre Hardy d, Thomas Bauer b
a Clinique du Landy, 23, rue du Landy, 93400 Saint-Ouen-sur-Seine, France 
b Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 9, avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France 
c Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France 
d Clinique du Sport, 36, boulevard Saint Marcel, 75005 Paris, France 

Corresponding author at: Clinique du Landy, 23, rue du Landy, 93400 Saint-Ouen-sur-Seine, France.Clinique du Landy23, rue du LandySaint-Ouen-sur-Seine93400France

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous forefoot surgery has been associated with higher radiation exposure than the conventional approach. However, there is little data on forefoot surgery using a mini C-arm intensifier. We, therefore, conducted a prospective study to (1) evaluate the intraoperative radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm; (2) compare the radiation received by the surgeon with the guidelines for occupational exposure issued by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (20 millisieverts per year [mSv/year] for the whole body, 500mSv/year for the hands, and 20mSv/year for the lens of the eye); and (3) compare the radiation received during percutaneous forefoot surgery with that of the open approach, which has already been reported in the literature.

Hypothesis

The radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm is lower than the ICRP guidelines, and the findings reported in the literature.

Materials and methods

This prospective single-center study was conducted from September 2020 to May 2021. A total of 639 feet (i.e., 435 patients) were included. Of these 639 feet, 336 (52%) were hallux valgus repairs, 49 (8%) were stand-alone procedures of the lateral rays, and 124 (19%) were a combination of both. The radiation dose data was retrieved from the mini C-arm daily: dose-area product (DAP) in centigray per square centimeter (cGy/cm2) and radiation exposure duration in seconds. The doses received by the surgeon were collected every month by 4 passive dosimeters (hand, eye lens, and chest [on and under the lead apron]) and 2 active dosimeters (on and under the lead apron).

Results

The DAP emitted by the mini C-arm during an operating day was 0.10±0.01cGy/cm2 (range, 0.0–3.9), and the mean daily radiation duration was 34.7±19.3seconds (range, 0.7–226.8). There was a mean of 8±8 (range, 1–18) elective procedures per operating day. The daily reading on the active dosimeter worn on the lead apron was 0.002±0 microSv (range, 0–0.04), while the one worn under the apron was 0.001±0 microSv (range, 0–0.03). The equivalent doses over the 7-month study period for the hand, eye lens, and chest (over and under the apron) were 0.14mSv, 0mSv, 0.22mSv, and 0mSv, respectively.

Discussion/Conclusion

The radiation exposure in percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm intensifier observed in our study was lower than the ICRP recommendations and literature findings during open surgery.

Level of evidence

IV; prospective study without a control group.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Foot, Percutaneous, Minimally invasive, Radiation, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 109 - N° 8

Artículo 103705- décembre 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: Anatomical study of its safety and effectiveness
  • Ester Navarro-Cano, Ana Carrera, Marko Konschake, Kerbi Alejandro Guevara-Noriega, Francisco Reina
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Flexor Hallucis Longus decompression under ultrasound guidance: A cadaver study
  • Lolita Micicoi, Alexandre Rudel, Solenne Frey-Ollivier, Barbara Piclet-Legré

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.