Suscribirse

Patellar dislocation recurrence after pediatric MPFL reconstruction: Bone tunnels and soft tissues versus suture anchors and interference screw - 29/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103515 
Adrien Zampieri a, b, , Camille Girardin a, b, Bastien Hocquet b, c, Raphaël Coursier d, Adrien Fournier b, Claire Martin e, Eric Nectoux a, b, Federico Canavese a, b
a Université de médecine de Lille, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHU de Lille, Hauts de France, 59000 Lille, France 
b Service d’orthopédie pédiatrique, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHU de Lille, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France 
c Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, centre hospitalier de Lens, 99, route de la Bassée, 62300 Lens, France 
d Service d’orthopédie pédiatrique, hôpitaux catholiques de Lille Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, boulevard de Belfort, 59000 Lille, France 
e Département de biostatistiques, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France 

Corresponding author. Service d’orthopédie pédiatrique, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France.Service d’orthopédie pédiatrique, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandreavenue Eugène-AvinéeLille59000France

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

Several Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques have been developed, and those with soft tissue fixation are often preferred in children because they allow the growth cartilage to be preserved. Nevertheless, the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation varies widely from one series to another, with no clear superiority of one technique in the pediatric setting. The objectives of this study were to compare the results of two tendon graft fixation techniques (tendon-tendon fixation and anchor-screw fixation) by analyzing: 1) the rate of patellar dislocation recurrence, 2) clinical outcomes, 3) tourniquet time and 4) complication rate.

Hypothesis

The two tendon graft fixation techniques used in MPFL reconstruction are equivalent in terms of the patellar dislocation recurrence rate.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective comparative study including 57 patients with a median age of 14 years (12–15 years) who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2016 and 2020. The tendon graft was fixed upon itself, after passing through a patellar tunnel (Group A: tendon-tendon fixation; n=29) or by two anchors and an interference screw (Group B: anchor-screw fixation; n=28). The preoperative radiographic data were comparable in the two groups: patellar height [A: 1.3 (interquartile range (IQR): 1.2–1.4) / B: 1.2 (IQR: 1–1.4) (p=0.21)], tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TTTG) distance [A: 16 (IQR: 13–19) / B: 13.5 (IQR: 11.5–18.8) (p=0.12)], patellar tilt [A: 25 (IQR: 20–35) / B: 24.5 (IQR: 21–32) (p=0.93)]. For each technique, the rate of patellar dislocation recurrence, clinical and functional results (Kujala score, Marx activity score, Lille patellofemoral score), complications (pain, stiffness, revision) were analyzed. In addition to MPFL repair, 13 patients (2 in Group A, 11 in Group B) underwent additional orthopedic procedures to enhance patellar stability.

Results

no patients were lost to follow-up and the median follow-up was 30 months (IQR: 20–38). The dislocation recurrence rate was higher in Group A, 6.9% (2/29) compared to none in Group B. The clinical results were comparable for the two groups with a Kujala score [A: 94 (IQR: 89–100) / B: 92 (IQR: 87.5–94.5) (p=0.12)]; Marx score [A: 10 (IQR: 7–11) / B: 9.5 (IQR: 7.5–12) (p=0.89)] and Lille patellofemoral score [A: 97 (IQR: 91–100) / B: 94 (IQR: 90–98) (p=0.21)]. The tourniquet time was shorter in Group A than in Group B, 61minutes (IQR: 52-71) versus 85minutes (IQR: 55-115) (p=0.024) excluding additional orthopedic procedures. The complication rate was 17.2% (5/29) in Group A (dislocation n=2, stiffness n=2, ATT (anterior tibial tuberosity) revision with screw removal n=1) and 10.7% (3/28) in B (pain n=1, ATT revision with screw removal n=2) (p=0.35).

Conclusion

Clinically, anchor-screw fixation appears to reduce the risk of patellar dislocation recurrence but this could not be statistically tested. On the other hand, the two techniques are comparable in terms of the functional results.

Level of evidence

III; retrospective case-control study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Patella, Medial patellofemoral ligament, Patellar instability, Patella dislocation, Reconstruction


Esquema


© 2022  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 109 - N° 8

Artículo 103515- décembre 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Development and validation of a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC Questionnaire
  • Michka Nazon, Philippe Moisan, Nathalie Jourdain, Éliane Rioux-Trottier, Lydia Saad, Guy Grimard, Mathilde Hupin, Marie-Lyne Nault
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Isolated MPFL reconstruction with soft tissue femoral fixation technique in 54 skeletally immature patients: Clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up. A French multicenter retrospective study
  • Nicolas Bremond, Renaud Prima, Pierre-Yves Rabattu, Franck Accadbled, Franck Chotel, Moritz Konkel, Ahmad Eid, Corentin Philippe, Audrey Godinho, Marco Turati, Eva Sole Cruz

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.