Suscribirse

Are self-reported anthropometric data reliable enough to meet antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in orthopedic surgery? - 01/11/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103627 
Michael Butnaru a, , Matthieu Lalevée b, Pierre-Alban Bouché c, Thomas Aubert a, Antoine Mouton a, Blandine Marion a, Simon Marmor a
a Hôpital Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 125, rue d’Avron, 75020 Paris, France 
b Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France 
c Hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection is a serious complication in orthopedic surgery. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) combined with other prevention strategies has been shown to reduce this risk to 1% for hip arthroplasty and 2% for knee arthroplasty. The French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) recommends doubling the dose when the patient's weight is greater than or equal to 100 kg, and the body mass index (BMI) is greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Similarly, patients with a BMIgreater than40 kg/m2 orlesser than18 kg/m2 are ineligible for surgery in our hospital. Self-reported anthropometric measurements are commonly used in clinical practice to calculate BMI, but their validity has not been assessed in the orthopedic literature. Therefore, we conducted a study comparing self-reported with systematically measured values and observed the impact these differences may have on perioperative AP regimens and contra-indications to surgery.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis of our study was that self-reported anthropometric values differed from those measured during preoperative orthopedic consultations.

Materials and methods

This single-center retrospective study with prospective data collection was conducted between October and November 2018. The patient-reported anthropometric data were first collected and then directly measured by an orthopedic nurse. Weight was measured with a precision of 500 g and height was measured with a precision of 1 cm.

Results

A total of 370 patients (259 women and 111 men) with a median age of 67 years (17–90) were enrolled. The data analysis found significant differences between the self-reported and measured height [166 cm (147–191) vs. 164 cm (141–191) (p<0.0001)], weight [72.9 kg (38–149) vs. 73.1 kg (36–140) (p<0.0005)] and BMI [26.3 (16.2–46.4) vs. 27 (16–48.2) (p<0.0001)]. Of these patients, 119 (32%) reported an accurate height, 137 (37%) an accurate weight, and 54 (15%) an accurate BMI. None of the patients had two accurate measurements. The maximum underestimation was 18 kg for weight, 9 cm for height, and 6.15 kg/m2 for BMI. The maximum overestimation was 28 kg for weight, 10 cm for height, and 7.2 kg/m2 for BMI. The verification of the anthropometric measurements identified another 17 patients who had contra-indications to surgery (12 with a BMI>40 kg/m2 and 5 with a BMI<18 kg/m2) and who would not have been detected based on the self-reported values.

Conclusions

Although patients underestimated their weight and overestimated their height in our study, these had no impact on the perioperative AP regimens. However, this misreporting failed to detect potential contraindications to surgery.

Level of evidence

IV; retrospective study with prospective data collection and no control group.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Arthroplasty, Body mass index, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Arthritis, Infectious etiology, Obesity, Complications


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 109 - N° 7

Artículo 103627- novembre 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • How to avoid systematic postoperative blood test after total hip arthroplasty: A new risk scoring system compared to Wu's score
  • Gautier Beckers, Julie Manon, Gauthier Lejeune, Maximilian Gläser, Ludovic Kaminski, Olivier Cornu, Maité Van Cauter
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty by direct minimally invasive anterolateral approach: A controlled study
  • Matthieu Lalevée, Lucas Martinez, Benjamin Rey, Julien Beldame, Jean Matsoukis, Thomas Poirier, Helena Brunel, Stéphane Van Driessche, Nathalie Noé, Fabien Billuart

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.