Suscribirse

Primary repair of acute versus chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon. Comparison of functional results in a case-control study - 19/08/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103559 
Yacine Carlier a, , Pieter Antoine Pierreux a, b
a Centre de l’arthrose de Mérignac, clinique du sport Bordeaux-Mérignac, 6, rue Georges-Nègrevergne, 33700 Mérignac, France 
b Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthoclinic Brugge, AZ Sint-Jan AV, Brugge – Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

In the event of a rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii, most authors recommend early reinsertion to recover optimal elbow function. However, these ruptures are not always diagnosed or promptly referred to surgeons, thus creating a delay in treatment. Studies reporting functional results in cases of chronic repair (greater than 21 days) of the distal biceps brachii tendon show an increased rate of complications.

Hypothesis

Primary repairs of chronic ruptures (treatment delayed for more than 21 days) and acute ruptures of the distal biceps give the same functional results and the same rate of complications.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective study between January 2017 and December 2021 comparing chronic primary repair of the distal biceps at the elbow (experimental group, comprising 75 patients) and acute (control group, comprising 135 patients) by endobutton. We analyzed the time between trauma and surgery, and assessed short- and long-term functional recovery by measuring residual pain (VAS), a collection of the following functional scores: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), as well as a measure of strength (as a percentage of the healthy side). We evaluated the rate of complications and radiographically analyzed the rate of heterotopic ossification.

Results

The mean time between trauma and surgery was 73±66 days (experimental group) versus 11.2±5 days (control group). In the short-term (4.79±2.09 months), there was no significant difference in the MEPS, Q-DASH and PREE functional scores between the two groups (p=0.354, p=0.412 and p=0.958, respectively). In the long-term (28.9±17.9 months), the functional evolution remained similar. The recovery of strength in flexion and supination was 89.19±13.43% and 77.48±16.68%, respectively, and similar in the two cohorts (p=0.476 and p=0.395). There was no difference in the rate of complications; however, the rate of heterotopic ossification was higher in the control group (p=0.006).

Discussion

The functional results and the recovery of strength did not change according to the time until surgery. Although the overall complication rate was similar, repairs of the biceps in less than 21 days led to more heterotopic ossification.

Level of evidence

III; retrospective case-control study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Distal biceps tendon rupture, Acute primary repair, Chronic primary repair, Endobutton, Elbow


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 109 - N° 5

Artículo 103559- septembre 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Incidence and pattern of concurrent capitellum fracture associated with radial head and neck fractures
  • Cheungsoo Ha, Jun-Ku Lee, Segi Kim, Seongmin Jo, Jaiwoo Chung, Soo-Hong Han
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Radiographic evaluation of ulnar deformity in patients with hereditary multiple osteochondroma and its relationship with radial head dislocation
  • Philippe Massard-Combe, Alexandre Debs, Marine De Tienda, Zagorka Pejin, Mathilde Gaume, Stéphanie Pannier

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.