Suscribirse

Optimal treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma based on recurrence time and tumor size: A propensity score matching study - 11/08/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102157 
Wenwu Wan, Hao Zhang, Tao Ji, Li Zhang, KaiGuo Luo, Ding Xiong
 Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meishan People's Hospital, Meishan 640000, Sichuan, China 

Corresponding author.

Highlights

Currently, there are no global guidelines to regulate the treatment of RHCC. This study analyzed the prognosis of RH and TACE-MWA in the treatment of RHCC by retrospective case-control.
Recurrence time and tumor size may affect patient prognosis, therefore, subgroup analysis based on recurrence time and tumor size was conducted in this study.
It is inevitable that there are differences among patients receiving different treatments. Therefore, PSM was adopted in this study to balance the differences between groups.
Through retrospective analysis, the results of this study suggest that patients with RHCC should adopt personalized treatment, and the treatment methods are different with different recurrence time and tumor size.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is commonly treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) or repeated hepatectomy(RH), but the optimal treatment strategy is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE-MWA and RH in RHCC patients after initial radical hepatectomy.

Methods

A total of 210 RHCC patients were included between June 2014 and January 2021, with 126 patients in the TACE-MWA group and 84 patients in the RH group. The primary endpoints were median repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was complications. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize bias. Subgroup analysis based on recurrence patterns (recurrence time and tumor size) was performed, and prognostic factors were studied.

Results

Before PSM, the RH group had better median OS (37.0 vs 26.0 months, P<0.001) and rRFS (15.0 vs 14.0 months, P = 0.003). After PSM, the RH group also had a better median OS (33.5 vs 29.0 months, P = 0.038), but there was no significant difference in median rRFS between the two groups (14.0 vs 13.0 months, P = 0.099). Subgroup analysis showed that when RHCC diameter>5 cm, RH had a better median OS (33.5 vs 25.0 months, P = 0.013) and rRFS (14.0 vs 10.9 months, P = 0.030). When the RHCC diameter was≤5 cm, there was no significant difference in the median OS (37.0 vs 31.0 months, P = 0.338) and rRFS (15.0 vs 17.0 months, P = 0.758) between the two groups. When RHCC relapses in the early stage (≤2 years), there is no significant difference in the median OS (26.0 vs 26.0 months, P = 0.310) and rRFS (12.0 vs 10.5 months, P = 0.089) between the two groups. When RHCC relapses in the late stage (>2 years), the RH group has better median OS (41.0 vs 33.0 months, P<0.001) and rRFS (30.0 vs 20.0 months, P = 0.010).

Conclusion

Individualized therapy is necessary for RHCC. TACE -MWA may be a good choice for RHCC with early recurrence or tumor diameter ≤5 cm. However, RH should be the first choice for RHCC with late recurrence or tumor diameter>5 cm.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Microwave ablation, Repeat hepatectomy, Overall survival, Recurrence-free survival


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 47 - N° 7

Artículo 102157- août 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Genomic characterization of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients with Hepatitis B using circulating tumor DNA
  • Daniel Lin, Rui Luo, Zhong Ye, Qiang Wei, Ho Bae, Hee-soon Juon, Hie Won Hann, James Posey, Chun Wang
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Safety and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Zhi-Xi Li, Qi-Fan Zhang, Jia-Ming Huang, Shao-Jian Huang, Han-Biao Liang, Hao Chen, Zhan-Hong Lai, Qing-Yan Li, Jian-Ping Qian, Kai Wang, Jie Zhou

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.