Suscribirse

Influence of humeral lengthening on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - 20/05/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103502 
Kevin A. Hao a, Ethan W. Dean b, Keegan M. Hones a, Joseph J. King c, Bradley S. Schoch d, Natalie E. Dean e, Kevin W. Farmer c, Aimee M. Struk c, Thomas W. Wright c,
a College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 
b Piedmont Orthopedics | OrthoAtlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA 
c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 
d Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA 
e Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA 

Corresponding author at: Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450, Hull Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida3450, Hull RoadGainesvilleFlorida32611USA

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

Deltoid tensioning secondary to humeral lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly theorized to be crucial to improving range of motion (ROM) but may predispose patients to acromial/scapular spine fractures and neurologic injury. Clinical evidence linking patient outcomes to humeral lengthening is limited. This study assesses the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA.

Methods

A single institution review of 284 RSAs performed in 265 patients was performed. Humeral lengthening was defined as the difference in the subacromial height preoperatively to postoperatively as measured on Grashey radiographs. The subacromial height was measured as the vertical difference between the most inferolateral aspect of the acromion and the most superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was assessed on a continuous basis. Secondarily, clinical outcomes were assessed using a dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening (≤25 vs. >25mm) based on prior clinical and biomechanical work purporting a correlation with clinical outcomes. Improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ROM and outcome scores after RSA were also compared.

Results

Humeral lengthening demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with postoperative ROM, clinical outcome scores, and shoulder strength and their improvement preoperatively to postoperatively. Furthermore, there were minimal differences in ROM measures, outcome scores, and shoulder strength when stratified using the dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening. No difference in the proportion of patients exceeding the MCID or SCB when stratified by humeral lengthening ≤25 vs. >25mm was found. There was no difference in humeral lengthening in patients with versus without complications.

Conclusion

No clear relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was identified. The previously purported 25mm threshold for humeral lengthening did not predict improved patient outcomes. Outcomes after RSA are multifactorial; the relationship between humeral lengthening and outcomes is likely confounded by other patient and surgical factors.

Level of Evidence

IV; Case Series.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Arm, Distalization, Scapular spine, Acromion, Fracture, RTSA


Esquema


© 2022  Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 109 - N° 4

Artículo 103502- juin 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Does isolated glenosphere lateralization affect outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
  • Joseph J. King, Keegan M. Hones, Thomas W. Wright, Christopher Roche, Joseph D. Zuckerman, Pierre H. Flurin, Bradley S. Schoch
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Glenoid reconstruction bone loss with a pediculated coracoid autograft during shoulder arthroplasty. A technical note
  • Alexandre Lädermann, Naif AlAmer, Patrick J. Denard, Tiago Martinho, Juan A. Hurtado, Philippe Collin

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.