Suscribirse

Impact of variants of SARS-CoV-2 on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes - 23/03/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102566 
M. Poisson a, §, J. Sibiude a, b, c, d, §, E. Mosnino e, M. Koual d, f, L. Landraud b, d, g, N. Fidouh h, L. Mandelbrot a, b, c, d, C. Vauloup-Fellous i, j, D. Luton j, k, A. Benachi e, j, A.J. Vivanti d, j, #, O. Picone a, b, c, d, #,
a AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Colombes, France 
b Université Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France 
c Groupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse, Colombes, France 
d Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire PREMA (FHU), Paris, France 
e Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140, Clamart, France 
f AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Paris, France 
g AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Department of Hygiene and Microbiology, Colombes, France 
h AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Department of Virology, Paris, France 
i Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 
j AP-HP, Division of Virology, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, INSERM U1193, Villejuif, France 
k APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

SARS-CoV-2 can lead to several types of complications during pregnancy. Variant surges are associated with different severities of disease. Few studies have compared the clinical consequences of specific variants on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate and compare disease severity in pregnant women and obstetrical or neonatal complications between variants of SARS-CoV-2 that have circulated in France over a two-year period (2020–2022).

Method

This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive naso-pharyngeal RT-PCR test) from March 12, 2020 to January 31, 2022, in three tertiary maternal referral obstetric units in the Paris metropolitan area, France. We collected clinical and laboratory data for mothers and newborns from patients’ medical records. Variant identification was either available following sequencing or extrapolated from epidemiological data.

Results

There were 234/501 (47%) Wild Type (WT), 127/501 (25%) Alpha, 98/501 (20%) Delta, and 42/501 (8%) Omicron. No significative difference was found regarding two composite adverse outcomes. There were significantly more hospitalizations for severe pneumopathy in Delta variant than WT, Alpha and Omicron respectively (63% vs 26%, 35% and 6%, p<0.001), more frequent oxygen administration (23% vs 12%, 10% and 5%, p = 0,001) and more symptomatic patients at the time of testing with Delta and WT (75% and 71%) versus Alpha and Omicron variants (55% and 66% respectively, p<0.01). Stillbirth tended to be associated with variants (p = 0.06): WT 1/231 (<1%) vs 4/126 (3%), 3/94 (3%), and 1/35 (3%) in Alpha, Delta and Omicron cases respectively. No other difference was found.

Conclusion

Although the Delta variant was associated with more severe disease in pregnant women, we found no difference regarding neonatal and obstetrical outcomes. Neonatal and obstetrical specific severity may be due to mechanisms other than maternal ventilatory and general infection.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Pregnancy, Outcome, Variant


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 52 - N° 4

Artículo 102566- avril 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Management and survival of foetuses with trisomy 18 in a French retrospective cohort Prise en charge et survie des fœtus porteurs de trisomie 18 dans une cohorte française rétrospective
  • Ana Bouzaglou, Gregoire Dumery, Alexandra Letourneau, Alexandra Benachi, Alexandre J Vivanti, Anne-Gael Cordier
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, IOTA simple rules and O-RADS for assessing the malignant risk of sonographically appearing solid ovarian masses
  • Beilei Lu, Chang Liu, Jiuling Qi, Wanyuan He, Tingyan Shi, Yuli Zhu, Beijian Huang

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.